# What are the best eDiscovery platforms for paralegals who highlight, comment, and filter by annotation during review?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hi, paralegals, litigation support and G2 reviewers who spend the day inside a review set. I am looking for the best<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/ediscovery"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/ediscovery">eDiscovery</a> platforms for paralegals who highlight, comment, and filter by annotation during review, and would value input from people doing the review itself rather than buying the platform.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Worth saying up front: this is a well-reviewed category, and the three below carry hundreds of reviews each from law practice and legal services. The difference between them is less about capability than about who is expected to run the database.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/everlaw/reviews"><strong>Everlaw</strong></a> (4.7) is described by reviewers as feature-rich without being complex, with binders for grouping documents and filtering tools used to narrow from broad concepts down to specific evidence when building deposition scripts. Reviewers would like subfolders within binders, and note that coding-layout permissions do not carry automatically to project admins.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/relativity/reviews"><strong>Relativity</strong></a> (4.5) allows custom objects and fields to match each matter, with item-level permissions controlling what each reviewer sees. Reviewers describe it as comprehensive and still usable, with the trade-off that setup takes an administrator who knows the platform.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/logikcull/reviews"><strong>Logikcull</strong></a> (4.7) is built for self-service, with bulk tagging and customisable coding fields that reviewers say let team members with limited eDiscovery experience work directly on the data. Reviewers comparing it to Relativity find it lighter on analytics and workflow customisation in very large matters.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For those reviewing daily: which annotation workflow actually survives a second pass, and did you keep it in-house or hand it to a vendor?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 7 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Our annotation workflow on Everlaw has survived a second pass fine so far. We kept it in-house rather than handing it to a vendor, and it&#39;s held up well for our case volume.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 4 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4