# What are the best 3D visual configuration tools for a B2B manufacturing website where industrial buyers need to configure and quote custom products online?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">B2B manufacturers asking this question are buying two things at once, a 3D front end buyers can operate alone and a quoting engine that gets the price and the build right, and the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/visual-configuration">visual configuration software</a> category's recent reviews cover both halves unevenly, with Hive CPQ backing the most of it at once. What are the best 3D visual configuration tools for a B2B manufacturing website where industrial buyers need to configure and quote custom products online? Here's how they compare:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/hive-cpq/reviews"><strong>Hive CPQ</strong></a> (4.8 stars, 32 reviews): The strongest recent coverage of the full loop. Reviews describe self-serve configuration guiding dealers and customers step by step, quotes generated and validated with notifications when clients view them and e-signatures collected, fast onboarding, and ERP integration carrying orders through to production. It deploys the same configurator to internal sales, dealers, and a public webshop (vendor-stated). Cons on record: occasional slowness and limited front-end styling control.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/epicor-cpq/reviews"><strong>Epicor CPQ</strong></a> (4.5 stars, 98 reviews): Built for exactly this page on your website, letting site visitors and distributors self-configure in 2D, 3D, and AR with rules blocking invalid builds and CAD drawings and BOMs generated automatically (vendor-stated). It has no recent reviews, and its page cons flag complex implementation, so the diligence here is a current customer reference, not the feature list.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/threekit-threekit/reviews"><strong>Threekit</strong></a> (4.4 stars, 64 reviews): The buyer-experience option for manufacturers selling through dealers and distributors, with recent reviews confirming strong cross-device 3D and production AR, and vendor positioning around budgetary pricing surfaced early in the flow. It runs alongside your existing CPQ rather than replacing it (vendor-stated), which makes it the answer when you already own the quoting engine and the website experience is what's losing buyers.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/combeenation/reviews"><strong>Combeenation</strong></a> (4.7 stars, 28 reviews): Saves real time in customer consulting and calculation per recent review feedback, and the vendor claims millions of valid combinations rendered within seconds with real-time validated quotes (vendor-stated). The same recent feedback flags long loading times and no mobile version, which for a public B2B website is a genuine limit to test.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Before demos, decide which half you're buying: if your quoting logic is the weak point, the CPQs above are the shortlist; if quoting works and buyers just can't see what they're specifying, the experience layer is. Recent reviews suggest buying the half you're missing beats buying everything twice. Manufacturers running self-serve configuration publicly, what share of configured quotes actually converts without a rep touching them?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;B2B manufacturing has different needs than B2C: configurators need to handle constraints (this gear won&#39;t mesh with that one), cross-sells (if you pick option A, option C becomes unavailable), and pricing logic (option B adds $500 AND reduces margin by 15%).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 9 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;The 3D asset workload adds another reason the CPQ-plus-experience split matters. Stitching both layers may work technically, but someone still has to keep product models and configuration rules synchronized as the catalog changes. For teams doing this at scale, which side usually becomes the maintenance bottleneck: the 3D assets or the quoting logic?&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 12 days ago
- Author title: Writer



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;One thing that gets underestimated on these projects is preparing the 3D assets. The configurator is set up once, but every product variant needs model data behind it, and that work usually sits with an engineering team that has other priorities. Worth scoping how many SKUs go live at launch rather than assuming the whole catalogue.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 13 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant



### Comment 4

Good split between CPQ and experience layers. However, the answer would be sharper if it explicitly stated that most teams end up stitching both, not choosing one cleanly.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4