# PowerSchool SIS vs Infinite Campus vs Alma SIS for a K-12 school district selecting a new student information system: which gives the best balance of feature completeness, ease of use for teachers, and total cost of ownership?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">PowerSchool SIS vs Infinite Campus vs Alma SIS for a K-12 school district selecting a new student information system: which gives the best balance of feature completeness, ease of use for teachers, and total cost of ownership? I compared all three across the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/k-12-student-information-systems"><strong>K-12 student information systems</strong></a> category, and the three-way has a structural imbalance a district should know before weighing anything: only one of the three has any recent review evidence at all. Here's how they compare on the question's three axes:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/powerschool-sis/reviews"><strong>PowerSchool SIS</strong></a> (4.2 stars, 742 reviews): Feature completeness is its clearest win, and it's current: recent reviews describe district-grade integrations, inventory management, Canvas grade sync, intuitive reporting, and sample-report libraries in active use. Teacher ease is middling by design: an 8.0 G2 ease-of-use score right at category average, with recent teacher reviews praising daily usability and flagging the curve and menu-hunting beyond it. Total cost of ownership is where diligence belongs: no published pricing, high-cost mentions in its cons, and recent district review feedback describing a consolidation project dropped mid-stream with billing disputes, which makes contract structure, not sticker price, the real TCO variable.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/infinite-campus/reviews"><strong>Infinite Campus</strong></a> (3.7 stars, 203 reviews): The credible-on-paper contender with the silent record: full district scope from administration to state reporting (vendor-stated), but zero reviews in my twelve-month pulls, the lowest rating of the three on a substantial base, and a 7.1 ease score that undercuts the teacher-ease leg outright. Its TCO is equally unpublished. It stays in the comparison because its footprint is real; every one of its three legs currently rests on references you'd have to gather yourself.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/alma-sis/reviews"><strong>Alma SIS</strong></a> (4.2 stars, 63 reviews): The interesting outsider: it matches PowerSchool's overall rating on a much smaller base, posts the best ease score of the trio at 8.3, and positions on modern design for districts of every size (vendor-stated). The completeness leg is its question mark for a large district, its base skews mid-market and smaller, and like Infinite Campus it landed zero reviews in my recent pulls, so its current experience is also reference-borne. For a small-to-mid district prioritizing teacher experience, it's the one I'd most want to see demo live; for a large district, completeness proof is on it.</li>
<li>On TCO across all three, the honest statement: none publishes pricing, all quote per-student, and G2 reviews cannot compare what none of them discloses. The TCO comparison that actually works: require each finalist to provide three districts your size with year-two and year-three actual costs, implementation included, and make the recent PowerSchool merger-project feedback your template for what to contractually prevent, regardless of which vendor you pick.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">My read on the balance question is that PowerSchool wins completeness with current evidence and average ease, Alma wins the ease axis with the least completeness proof at scale, and Infinite Campus currently trails on every measurable axis while retaining the footprint to compete through references. For a large district the evidence points to PowerSchool with hard contract terms; for a smaller district that weights teacher experience heavily, Alma has earned the demo that its quiet review record hasn't yet backed up.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">District folks who've run this exact bake-off, which of the three survived your scoring matrix, and did teacher panels change the outcome? That detail would help every district reading this thread.</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 19 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Across the three, PowerSchool carries the deepest set of G2 reviews, which makes it a solid reference point: its feature completeness and its learning curve both come through clearly. Alma tends to review well on ease of use and support for smaller setups, while Infinite Campus is respected on capability. On total cost of ownership, the reviews point less to license price and more to onboarding and staff time, so a parallel run before cutover is a common way districts keep the switch smooth. One aspect that no listing captures is how your teacher panel reacts, which is important to consider.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 15 days ago
- Author title: Marketer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4