# Best Patch Management Solutions for Infrastructure and Security Teams Managing Continuous Critical Updates

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For infrastructure and security teams juggling a steady stream of critical updates, these are the platforms that come up most in G2's <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/patch-management">Patch Management</a> category for automation over manual patch pushes.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/ninjaone/reviews">NinjaOne</a> (4.7/5, 5,036 reviews): the top-scoring Leader on the Grid, reviewers highlight having RMM, endpoint management, and patching in one centralized hub, with alerts, automations, and scripts that let a small team keep tabs on device health across many environments at once. Usage is concentrated in small and mid-sized organizations, up to 1,000 employees.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/action1/reviews">Action1</a> (4.9/5, 1,201 reviews): reviewers repeatedly point to automated OS and third-party patching, real-time vulnerability visibility, and the ability to manage endpoints across multiple regions or continents without VPN infrastructure. It skews mid-market, with 51 to 1,000 employees typical among reviewers.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/automox/reviews">Automox</a> (4.5/5, 323 reviews): reviewers describe policy-driven automation that closes security gaps in hours rather than weeks across Windows, macOS, and Linux fleets from a single console, with worklet scripting for anything outside the standard patch catalog. It's used by a mix of mid-market and larger organizations, with 22% of reviewers at more than 1,000 employees.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Which of these, or another patch management platform, is actually carrying your continuous update workload today, and how well does it hold up at scale?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 1 day ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;For continuous patching, I’d care less about how many updates a platform can push and more about how it handles the exceptions. The real operational burden starts with failed installs, devices that were offline, and patches that need rollback. I’d test how automatically each tool identifies, retries, and escalates those cases without turning them into another manual queue.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 1 day ago
- Author title: Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4