# Best Drug Testing platforms for small HR teams managing high-volume hiring without dedicated screening staff

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">When a small HR team has to push a lot of candidates through screening without a dedicated compliance hire, the platform's automation and hand-holding matters as much as the checks themselves. Reviewers on <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/drug-testing">Drug Testing</a> point to a few options that hold up well for that exact situation.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/checkr/reviews">Checkr</a> (4.5★, 458 reviews, G2 Grid Leader): reviewers consistently describe it as eliminating manual scheduling and registration entirely, with ATS and HRIS integrations that mean status doesn't have to be tracked by hand. That's a direct fit for a team trying to run volume without adding screening-specific headcount.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/victig-background-checks/reviews">VICTIG Background Checks</a> (4.7★, 515 reviews, G2 Grid High Performer): the workflow only requires entering a candidate's name and email, with the candidate filling in the rest themselves, and reviewers describe account managers handling setup and package configuration directly. Several reviewers specifically call out how much it takes off their plate day to day.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/goodhire-a-checkr-company/reviews">GoodHire</a> (4.6★, 280 reviews, G2 Grid High Performer): built as an on-demand, self-serve workflow marketed for organizations of all sizes, and reviewers back that up with comments about how pain-free and fast the process feels. Worth knowing upfront that a few reviewers note pricing runs higher for smaller companies and that processing can occasionally take longer than expected.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Is the priority near-total automation of the screening workflow, a service that walks a small team through setup personally, or the simplest self-serve option even with an occasional slower report?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 11 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Near-total automation would matter most to me once hiring volume picks up. I’d want candidates to complete their own registration and scheduling, with status updates flowing back into the ATS automatically so HR only steps in for exceptions. The real efficiency metric would be how many screenings require manual HR intervention per 100 candidates.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 10 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4