# Are there industrial AR platforms that are actually practical for delivering digital work instructions on a production line without a major infrastructure rollout?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Are there industrial AR platforms that are actually practical for delivering digital <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/work-instructions">work instructions</a> on a production line without a major infrastructure rollout? That's what I've been trying to pin down for a piece, because AR looks great in a demo but the rollout is where it stalls. Here are three AR-specific tools reviewers actually run.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/rewo/reviews"><strong>REWO</strong></a> (4.8/5) is video-based SOPs with an AR and smart-glasses option that reviewers praise for training and remote troubleshooting with field techs. Several flag the glasses cost as the thing that can stall a rollout.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/augmentir/reviews"><strong>Augmentir</strong></a> (4.4/5) is more software-first than headset-first. Reviewers use it for AI-guided work instructions with conditional and branching steps plus remote expert assist, so a lot of value lands on tablets before you invest in wearables.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/arkite/reviews"><strong>Arkite</strong></a> (4.4/5) takes the projection route, casting instructions onto the workstation with smart-sensor validation, so workers follow guidance without a headset. The tradeoff reviewers mention is needing the space and a clear projector line of sight.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Has anyone run projection-based AR like Arkite next to a glasses-based option and found one easier to sustain on a busy line? And did the AR cut errors enough to justify the hardware, or would tablets have gotten you most of the way?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 29 days ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;We demoed both routes last year. Projection in the Arkite style was easier to sustain because there&#39;s nothing to charge, clean, or hand between shifts, but it only works if the station layout is stable and you have the overhead clearance. The glasses spent more time in the drawer than on faces. Honest answer to your second question: tablets got us about 80 percent of the value at a fraction of the cost, and we only kept projection at two high-error stations where hands-free genuinely mattered. I&#39;d start with tablets and let the error data argue for AR, not the demo.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 21 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4