# Appian vs Nintex for a team that wants to build internal process applications without needing a dedicated developer for every workflow change?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I’m looking at Appian vs Nintex for a team that wants to build internal process applications without needing a dedicated developer for every workflow change. The comparison seems to come down to ownership: who builds, who edits, and who maintains the workflow after launch?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">In the<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/business-process-management"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/business-process-management">business process management</a> category,<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/appian/reviews"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/appian/reviews"><strong>Appian</strong></a> looks better suited for complex enterprise workflows, case management, data consolidation, and audit-heavy applications. Reviewers say it can turn business requirements into working apps quickly, but advanced UI customization still requires technical depth. Pricing is also a common concern for mid-sized organizations.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/nintex-nintex/reviews"><strong>Nintex</strong></a> appears more accessible for administrators and non-technical managers, making day-to-day workflow changes. Reviewers highlight drag-and-drop tooling, AI suggestions, document automation, and approval workflows. The tradeoff is that complex workflows can become hard to manage without governance, and the mobile experience has room to improve.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">My working question is this: should business users own most changes, or should technical teams still control the complex pieces?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 20 days ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

These two sit at different points on the same spectrum, which is the useful thing to notice. One&#39;s a heavier low-code platform for building genuine applications, the other leans toward workflow and forms automation that&#39;s closer to the process owners. The &quot;without a dev for every change&quot; goal usually points to the lighter end, but only if your apps stay simple. How complex are these internal apps really? If it&#39;s mostly forms plus approvals plus routing, the heavyweight platform may be more than you&#39;ll ever touch.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 10 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4