Fundraising Software Resources
Articles, Discussions, and Reports to expand your knowledge on Fundraising Software
Resource pages are designed to give you a cross-section of information we have on specific categories. You'll find articles from our experts, discussions from users like you, and reports from industry data.
Fundraising Software Articles
What Is Crowdfunding? How to Finance Ideas for Rewards
Fundraising Trends in 2022
9 Online Auction Sites to Rival eBay
Nonprofits in the Time of COVID-19
How Crowdfunding Changed the Fundraising Landscape
The G2 on Nonprofit Tech: Mobile Optimization
What is a 501(c)(3)? (+9 Frequently Asked Questions, Answered)
What Is a Nonprofit Organization and How Is It Different from a Charity?
What Is a Capital Campaign? Definition, Benefits, and How to Plan Your Own
Fundraising Software Discussions
Integration
For anyone on G2 who evaluates physical security platforms for a living: which physical security platforms catch unauthorized access attempts before they turn into a serious incident, rather than surfacing the pattern only after the fact?
Three or four names keep coming up on the physical security leaderboard on G2 for catching that kind of thing early:
- Brivo (4.6/5, 35+ reviews): unifies access control, video intelligence, visitor management, and intrusion into one view built to proactively detect and deter threats across a whole site.
- Verkada (4.7/5, 135+ reviews): runs on a single cloud platform, Verkada Command, that surfaces events like a door held open or an unusual visitor check-in as they happen.
- Guardian (4.2/5, 60+ reviews): brings badge systems, visitor management, and identity platforms into one pane of glass, built to catch orphaned or leftover access before it becomes a gap.
- Spot AI (4.8/5, 75+ reviews): puts every camera and access point on one dashboard, so a pattern across multiple doors or sites shows up in one place instead of staying siloed.
Where has console consolidation actually mattered: catching the attempt itself, or making the pattern visible after several attempts across different doors?
In the cases I've come across, console consolidation seems to matter more for surfacing the pattern than for catching the first attempt itself, since one bad badge swipe rarely looks like anything on its own no matter how good the dashboard is. Where a unified view actually pays off is when someone tries a few doors across a site and that only reads as a real attempt once it's all sitting in one place instead of scattered across separate systems. So the value shows up a step later than "catching it before it happens" implies, more like catching it before it escalates into something bigger.
Question for the fundraising and nonprofit reviewers on G2. A donor gets to checkout, sees a toggle asking if they'll cover the fee, and has no idea what that fee actually is. Trying to find which fundraising platforms make donor transaction fees clear rather than hiding them behind a confusing toggle at the exact moment someone's deciding whether to give.
What actually matters here:
- The fee amount is visible before the donor has to decide anything
- Nonprofits aren't left guessing what they'll actually net per gift
- The toggle, if there is one, explains what it does in plain language
- Pricing holds up the same way whether it's a one-time gift or a recurring one
A few names on G2's fundraising list are built specifically around this:
- Zeffy (4.9/5, 2540+ reviews): covers processing costs itself and funds that through an optional tip donors can adjust at checkout, so nonprofits keep the full donation with no platform fee.
- Givebutter (4.7/5, 2190+ reviews): runs on what it calls a fully transparent tip-or-fee model at checkout, shown as a plain choice rather than a buried setting.
- RallyUp (4.8/5, 115+ reviews): offers a free plan built around donor tipping with no platform fee, alongside paid tiers with no setup fees or added subscriptions.
- Fundraise Up (4.8/5, 85+ reviews): publishes pricing as contract-free and fee-transparent, positioned so the platform's success lines up with what the nonprofit actually raises.
Where has a fee toggle actually confused a donor mid-gift, and did the nonprofit find out from a complaint, or from the numbers?
Zeffy's model of covering processing costs and funding it through an adjustable tip instead of a flat platform fee is exactly the kind of thing that should be the default, not the exception.