Customer service and willingness to listen to feedback; commitment to continued improvement, including responsiveness to user inputs; and overall robustness of the product and user interface. We were particularly focused on application to patent work in the life sciences and chemical arts, and Solve was one of the most robust tools we examined. Moreover, the product had the right balance in terms of prompt input and automation features - the overall user experience and interface was incredibly accessible. Our feedback is based on testing multiple similar tools in this space, and Solve was head and shoulders above all others. Since it is a cloud-based, browser-based product, implementation was a breeze and if one is familiar with the usual office tools, working with sequences, and chemical drawing software, it will be easy to implement and use.

We used Solve Intelligence for about a month and found it to be a highly useful tool, especially for computer-related inventions. The software performs particularly well in generating detailed specifications and flowcharts from minimal input. One standout feature is the ability to create patent drawings using just text prompts. The auto-generated method flowcharts and their accompanying descriptions are particularly impressive. These capabilities significantly reduce the time and effort needed to prepare high-quality patent drafts.

As a patent agent with nearly 25 years of experience in mechanical engineering and product development, I’ve trained numerous associates over the years to draft patent applications in my style—but after my most recent associate left the firm, I decided instead to fully integrate SolveIntelligence’s Patent Copilot into my workflow. The result has been nothing short of transformative. Rather than spending months/years training someone new, I can now rely on SI to consistently produce high-quality, well-structured drafts that reflect my strategic direction and drafting preferences. It automates the time-consuming parts—like Backgrounds, Summaries, and detailed technical descriptions—while allowing me to focus on claims, strategy, and client-specific innovation framing. The output is remarkably clear and better than what I used to expect from junior attorneys or I create over a week or two, and my drafting time has been reduced by 60% or more. I routinely generate applications in under a 5 hour, then fine-tune with the the included editor.