I run B2B prospecting daily on Hunter and Apollo, and I added FullEnrich as a third waterfall layer. It consistently pulls emails and mobile numbers the other two miss, so contactability of my lists went up, not just record count. The pay-for-results model keeps costs predictable, since I pay for a hit and not for every lookup. The 15+ source waterfall genuinely matters on harder segments. As a side effect it surfaced companies I did not have on my radar during discovery. Clean interface, fast to set up, and the integrations slot into my existing stack without friction. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The company list does not include a direct website URL column, so I cannot pull the company's website straight into the export. That slows down the workflow, because I have to look those links up separately. It is also not available as a filter, which would be useful when I want to segment by companies that have a site. Adding a website column and matching filter would remove that friction. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The most helpful thing about using it is that it makes my work easier. I can access all the pupils for any company, including their phone numbers and emails, which has helped me reach out to them for my B2B work. It also keeps my work well filtered and makes it easier to diagnose the needs of my company. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I dont dislike about it but there may be limitation of the data some of the big companies data are missing and also the bounce rate of the emails are 2-3% though its good than other apps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about FullEnrich is the depth and accuracy of its data. In my experience, the email addresses and phone numbers provided have had accuracy levels of more than 90%, which has been extremely valuable for my prospecting and outreach campaigns. The platform also saves me significant time during research, and I appreciate how easy it is to find and enrich prospect information through a simple interface. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main thing to be careful about is selecting the data points for enrichment. Make sure the Phone option is not selected unless you specifically need it, as phone number enrichment consumes 10 credits. A clearer warning about the credit cost of each enrichment option would help users avoid unintentionally spending credits Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about FullEnrich is its ability to quickly find verified professional contact information from LinkedIn profiles. It saves a significant amount of time, has a good enrichment rate, and integrates well with our outbound workflow. The accuracy of the data and the ease of use make it a valuable tool for recruitment and B2B prospecting. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main drawback is that some contact data can still be outdated or missing, especially for less active professionals. I would also like to see even broader international coverage, more transparent confidence scores for each data source, and additional native integrations with CRM and outreach platforms. Overall, the tool is very effective, but there is still room to improve data freshness and coverage. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The enrichment feature! It's fabulous - I haven't had a chance to use it for anything else like the Hunting feature. I did try it use it for my market and unfortunately I didn't find much information that was useful - I will have to try it again. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

On the occasion it doesn't produce for me contacts that I want to find, but it never charges me for the credits. I'm also displeased that I lose ALL my credits if I cancel, when I am paying for this out of my pocket (not company funded) and want a breather financially so I don't accumulate credits I'll never use. That honestly upset me, and then when I tried to pause it I couldn't even access it or use my credits at ALL. I know some investor or businessman told you to do it, but hear me, it is a piss poor business practice. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like first is the interface, which is perfect, extremely clear and user-friendly. It's a tool that does everything: it allows me to find the email addresses of all my prospects from LinkedIn lists, names, first names and companies, or websites, and also to verify if the addresses are useful. Before, I used to go through 3 or 4 complementary tools and often had inaccurate emails. With FullEnrich, in one go, I get the right emails. What is most pleasant is that I only pay for the emails actually found, unlike competitors where you pay for the request without getting results. You can also find phone numbers, it's more expensive but effective. The emails are safe, meaning of good quality. Instead of making long queries with pivot tables on Excel, I can directly import a list, retrieve the emails and import them into Instantly, which saves me a lot of time. After using a number of tools, the value for money is exceptional. It's a cloud-based interface, user-friendly, there's nothing to do for installation. I also use it with other tools and it works very well. I would recommend it 10 out of 10. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

nothing everything is fine, I have tried many other less good solutions Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find FullEnrich very useful and rich for finding email addresses and phone numbers, especially using a waterfall cadence that leverages the best providers for each region. It auto-selects whether the best provider is for European or American company data, and it handles that automatically for me. I like that I don't need to set up this waterfall myself, making it easier to find the right information. I also appreciate its MCP and API, which make it easy to use with Cloud Code, Clay, and other tools. The API integration lets me easily get the data I need through different flows, and the system's ability to automatically tap into different providers is a great feature. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing comes to mind. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I’ve been using FullEnrich for lead enrichment, and the data quality has stayed consistently strong. The email addresses and phone numbers are generally accurate, which makes a real difference in improving outreach results. I also like the waterfall approach, since it pulls from multiple sources and helps increase match rates. Overall, it’s been a reliable tool for prospecting. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The biggest drawback for me is that credits can run out quickly when I’m processing large lists, and the pricing feels a bit on the expensive side. Still, the data quality is consistently strong, and that reliability goes a long way toward justifying the cost. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate the search speed of FullEnrich, which allows processing a database of 200 to 300 profiles in just 5 minutes with a very interesting conversion rate of about 60 to 70%. A direct contact is a real plus and comfort during prospecting, even if it is not a guarantee of commercial conversion. The simplicity of use is also an advantage with the possibility of feeding the file to be enriched from a simple CSV or Excel file with a single column containing LinkedIn profile URLs. Finally, the initial setup was very simple thanks to a connection via the Google profile. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing in particular, even though direct extraction from LinkedIn or Sales Navigator searches would be great rather than having to go through Walaxy or Phantombuster, but I think that has more to do with LinkedIn than with FullEnrich. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The most helpful part about Full Enrich is how user friendly it is. The enrichment program takes minutes and is very efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I do wish that we were getting a higher percentage of enriched emails, but 50-60% is a good number overall. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.