Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Pricing Overview

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Pricing Key Insights

Last updated on Jul 28, 2026


Information about Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pricing, plan availability, and costs is not listed on G2 by the vendor. Buyers typically need to engage directly with the vendor to understand pricing options. Final cost negotiations to purchase Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) must be conducted with the seller.


Rated 4.3 / 5

*Pricing information is supplied by the software provider or retrieved from publicly accessible pricing materials. Final cost negotiations must be conducted with the seller.

Pricing Insights

Averages based on real user reviews.

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Pricing FAQs

Generated using AI
Is Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) free, or does it offer a free trial?

No. According to G2 data, Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) does not offer a free plan or free trial. Users need to purchase a paid plan to access the product. Visit the seller's official pricing page for current pricing details and plan options.

Who is Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pricing best suited for?

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)'s pricing is best suited for mid-market and enterprise organizations with dedicated security teams and complex cloud environments. G2 reviewers from mid-market companies in computer software, financial services, telecommunications, and IT services report strong satisfaction, citing multi-cloud support, CI/CD integration, and automated threat prevention as key value drivers at scale. Enterprise reviewers highlight hybrid environment coverage and compliance automation as primary benefits. G2 reviews of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) consistently flag the pricing of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) as a barrier for small businesses, with multiple small-business reviewers noting the cost is high relative to their needs and budget constraints.

What are the key differences between the free and paid versions of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)?

According to G2's pricing data for Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF), no publicly listed free tier or standard pricing tiers exist. One G2 enterprise reviewer in banking noted an initial entry price described as low with limited features available at no cost, suggesting a restricted evaluation mode may exist. Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)'s paid plans are delivered via custom enterprise quotes, unlocking full AI-driven threat prevention, API discovery, bot mitigation, DDoS protection, CI/CD integration, and centralized multi-cloud management. G2 reviewers note that full capabilities including automated policy tuning, zero-day protection, and Infinity portal access require a paid licensing agreement negotiated directly with Check Point.

Is Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) considered good value for its pricing?

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is widely regarded as a premium investment that delivers strong returns for mid-to-large organizations. G2 reviewers consistently praise its AI-driven zero-day protection, low false positive rates, and minimal manual tuning requirements as clear value drivers. However, cost concerns appear frequently across G2 reviews, particularly from small business users and those evaluating it against alternatives like Cloudflare WAF and Imperva WAF. High-rating reviewers who flag pricing still justify the cost through reduced operational overhead and security team efficiency gains. G2 reviews of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) suggest the pricing of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is best justified when automation savings and breach-risk reduction are factored into the total cost of ownership.

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Pricing Reviews

(2)
AT
aditya t.
Developer
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Powerful, Automated Protection for Modern Cloud Applications"
5/5
What do you like best about Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)?

It's designed to protect our websites , Api and cloud applications from cyber attacks. This protects our application from being hacked. random heavy traffic does not cause the website to go down. reduces false positives saving time for developers and testing. fully automated setup requires very little manual tuning. very powerful for modern cloud native applications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)?

It's many users say that its policies and rules are not easy to configure correctly. it's very expensive. technical engineers are not always available and troubleshooting takes time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Computer & Network Security
UC
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Powerful WAF, but complex setup and reporting need simplification"
2.5/5
What do you like best about Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)?

What I like most about Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is how it combines strong security capabilities with a relatively straightforward management experience. The UI is clean and well organized, which makes it easier to monitor traffic, review security events, and manage policies without adding unnecessary complexity.

Its integration capabilities are another plus, especially when connecting the WAF to existing cloud environments and established security workflows. Performance has been reliable as well, providing solid protection without a noticeable impact on application responsiveness. From an ROI standpoint, centralized security management and the reduced effort needed for ongoing monitoring and policy administration make it a worthwhile investment for organizations that require consistent web application protection.

Onboarding and support have also been helpful, particularly when I’ve had configuration or troubleshooting questions. I also appreciate the intelligence built into the platform, which helps identify suspicious activity and potential threats more efficiently than relying entirely on manual analysis. Overall, it strikes a strong balance between security, usability, performance, and operational efficiency. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)?

One area that could be improved is the overall complexity of configuration and policy management. Although the interface is generally well organized, some advanced settings take time to understand, especially for new users or teams that aren’t already familiar with web application security concepts. Because of this learning curve, initial setup and troubleshooting can end up being more time-consuming than expected.

Pricing can also be a factor for smaller organizations, particularly when additional capabilities or higher levels of protection are needed. Reporting and analytics could be more intuitive as well; clearer insights and more streamlined dashboards would help users identify trends faster and prioritize security events more effectively. Overall, the product is powerful, but simplifying advanced workflows and making the platform feel more transparent and accessible would significantly improve the user experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.