--- title: Canonical LXD Reviews meta_title: 'Canonical LXD Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2' meta_description: Filter 16 reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to find out how Canonical LXD works for a business like yours. aggregate_rating: rating_value: 4.4 review_count: 16 scale: '5' date_modified: '2026-10-23' parent_category: name: Containerization url: https://www.g2.com/categories/containerization ---

Canonical LXD Pros and Cons: Top 5 Advantages and Disadvantages

Quick AI Summary Based on G2 Reviews

Generated from real user reviews

Users are impressed by the easy-to-use management of containers in Canonical LXD, enhancing their container and VM experience. (4 mentions)
Users love the ease of managing containers with Canonical LXD, enjoying its simplicity and speed. (2 mentions)
Users find the installation process easy with Canonical LXD, appreciating its lightweight and efficient setup. (1 mentions)
Users find Canonical LXD to be a fast and reliable solution for managing Linux Containers and VMs effortlessly. (1 mentions)
Users love the simple management of Canonical LXD, making container handling as easy as virtual machines. (1 mentions)
Users find the repackaging complexity of ISO files for Windows VMs cumbersome compared to Linux VMs. (1 mentions)
Users find the complex setup of Canonical LXD challenging, particularly for tasks like USB redirection and file mapping. (1 mentions)
The difficult learning curve of Canonical LXD can be challenging initially, but it becomes rewarding with time. (1 mentions)
Users find LXD to be not user-friendly due to its complex, CLI-only interface that lacks intuitiveness. (1 mentions)
Users find the poor UI design of Canonical LXD complicates basic setups, hindering ease of use. (1 mentions)

5 Pros or Advantages of Canonical LXD

1. Features
Users are impressed by the easy-to-use management of containers in Canonical LXD, enhancing their container and VM experience.
See 4 mentions

See Related User Reviews

Hinal S.
HS

Hinal S.

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

3.5/5

"Best environment to work virtually"

What do you like about Canonical LXD?

I'm really impressed by Canonical LXD! It's like a supercharged way to manage containers that feels as easy as using virtual machines. They've got th

Shwetank D.
SD

Shwetank D.

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

3.5/5

"Good Product for Multi-Environment workloads"

What do you like about Canonical LXD?

It's beneficial for workloads that rely on host operating systems like containers and need robust execution irrespective of the platform in order to b

2. Container Management
Users love the ease of managing containers with Canonical LXD, enjoying its simplicity and speed.
See 2 mentions

See Related User Reviews

Hinal S.
HS

Hinal S.

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

3.5/5

"Best environment to work virtually"

What do you like about Canonical LXD?

I'm really impressed by Canonical LXD! It's like a supercharged way to manage containers that feels as easy as using virtual machines. They've got th

Verified User
A

Verified User

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

4.0/5

"Nice solution to manage virtual machines/containers on Ubuntu Linux"

What do you like about Canonical LXD?

Canonical LXD is a nice and lightweight solution to manage Linux Containers or VMs. It is easy to install with the Ubuntu package manager and offers a

3. Installation Ease
Users find the installation process easy with Canonical LXD, appreciating its lightweight and efficient setup.
See 1 mentions

See Related User Reviews

Verified User
A

Verified User

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

4.0/5

"Nice solution to manage virtual machines/containers on Ubuntu Linux"

What do you like about Canonical LXD?

Canonical LXD is a nice and lightweight solution to manage Linux Containers or VMs. It is easy to install with the Ubuntu package manager and offers a

4. Reliability
Users find Canonical LXD to be a fast and reliable solution for managing Linux Containers and VMs effortlessly.
See 1 mentions

See Related User Reviews

Verified User
A

Verified User

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

4.0/5

"Nice solution to manage virtual machines/containers on Ubuntu Linux"

What do you like about Canonical LXD?

Canonical LXD is a nice and lightweight solution to manage Linux Containers or VMs. It is easy to install with the Ubuntu package manager and offers a

5. Simple
Users love the simple management of Canonical LXD, making container handling as easy as virtual machines.
See 1 mentions

See Related User Reviews

Hinal S.
HS

Hinal S.

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

3.5/5

"Best environment to work virtually"

What do you like about Canonical LXD?

I'm really impressed by Canonical LXD! It's like a supercharged way to manage containers that feels as easy as using virtual machines. They've got th

5 Cons or Disadvantages of Canonical LXD

1. Complexity
Users find the repackaging complexity of ISO files for Windows VMs cumbersome compared to Linux VMs.
See 1 mentions

See Related User Reviews

Shwetank D.
SD

Shwetank D.

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

3.5/5

"Good Product for Multi-Environment workloads"

What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?

The repackaging of the ISO file in the case of the Windows Virtual Machine needs a distrobuilder, which is a cumbersome process compared to the Linux

2. Complex Setup
Users find the complex setup of Canonical LXD challenging, particularly for tasks like USB redirection and file mapping.
See 1 mentions

See Related User Reviews

Harshal G.
HG

Harshal G.

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

4.5/5

"Works really good for development environments"

What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?

No built in gui, it is being developed but so far it is not released. Too complicated for simple setup like redirecting usb devices or ports or mappin

3. Difficult Learning
The difficult learning curve of Canonical LXD can be challenging initially, but it becomes rewarding with time.
See 1 mentions

See Related User Reviews

Hinal S.
HS

Hinal S.

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

3.5/5

"Best environment to work virtually"

What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?

Learning curve was a bit steeper than expected but once I got the hang of it, Canonical LXD proved its worth! Also, keep an eye on system resources it

4. Not User-Friendly
Users find LXD to be not user-friendly due to its complex, CLI-only interface that lacks intuitiveness.
See 1 mentions

See Related User Reviews

Verified User
A

Verified User

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

4.0/5

"Nice solution to manage virtual machines/containers on Ubuntu Linux"

What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?

LXD is a very powerful tool but not so intuitive for some users as it is a CLI-only based tool.

5. Poor UI Design
Users find the poor UI design of Canonical LXD complicates basic setups, hindering ease of use.
See 1 mentions

See Related User Reviews

Harshal G.
HG

Harshal G.

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

4.5/5

"Works really good for development environments"

What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?

No built in gui, it is being developed but so far it is not released. Too complicated for simple setup like redirecting usb devices or ports or mappin

Top-Rated Alternatives

DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
4.6/5(759)
Akamai Cloud Computing
Akamai Cloud Computing
4.6/5(410)
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
4.5/5(306)

Canonical LXD Reviews FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: Nov 04, 2026

What is Canonical LXD, and what problem is it built to solve?

Canonical LXD is used to manage Linux containers and virtual machines. Teams use it to keep development and project environments isolated while running them on shared hardware with relatively low resource overhead.

What company sizes and industries is Canonical LXD the best fit for?

Canonical LXD has its strongest reviewer presence among small businesses, with mid-market and enterprise organizations also represented. The most represented industry segments are information technology and services and computer software.
  • Company size: Small businesses, mid-market organizations, and enterprise teams.
  • Industry: Information technology and services and computer software.

Canonical LXD Reviews (16)

Reviews

Canonical LXD Reviews (16)

4.4
16 reviews
Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
Here's how.
Verified User in Computer Software
UC
Verified User in Computer Software
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Canonical LXD"
4/5
What do you like best about Canonical LXD?

LXD provides support for system containers and virtual machines.

When running a system container, LXD simulates a virtual version of an entire operating system. To do this, it uses the functionality provided by the kernel running on the host system.

When running a virtual machine, LXD uses the host system's hardware, but the virtual machine provides the kernel. Therefore, virtual machines can be used to run, for example, a different operating system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?

LXD can also be used with other platforms and tools, like Ansible, Juju, MAAS, Terraform, and more. Self-service, remote Windows, CentOS, ESXi, and Ubuntu on real servers turn your data center into a bare-metal cloud. MAAS integrates with LXD to provide easy creation of virtual machines. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ahmed S.
AS
Ahmed S.
Infrastructure Team Lead
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"The flexibility of deploying containers"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Canonical LXD?

The ease of deploying a container in just a few simple steps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?

There is a problem in Lxd as this software has no package in the apt of Debian or Ubuntu and you need to install it with snap and this will put a layer of file system that you don't need. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sudhanshu S.
SS
Sudhanshu S.
Senior Software Engineer
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Containerization using Canonical LXD"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Canonical LXD?

CoreAPI: which is very scalable, event-based, and has excellent product support. Backup And Restore: All objects are managed by LXD and using CRUI, we can do live migration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?

It cannot be integrated with K8s, Jenkins, public cloud technology stacks. Not very popular like docker, so not too many discussions are available at StackOverflow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Computer Software
AC
Verified User in Computer Software
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"The simplest and usefully way to start with containers"
5/5
What do you like best about Canonical LXD?

Easy of use, minimal resource requirements Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?

Lack of an integrated web management view Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Mike B.
MB
Mike B.
C-Level Executive / Platform Architect / Advisor
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Middle ground for those who need monolithic systems with the performance of containers"
4/5
What do you like best about Canonical LXD?

High performance due to running in LXC (Linux Containers), but for single system installs. Compatible with existing Vagrant box workflow via vagrant-lxd provider (and can be coupled without a cloud provider such as vagrant-digitalocean for a high performance local dev that can match affordable staging and production environments and can even spin them up), or via lxdock (less robust and not well maintained anymore). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?

Setup can be difficult to newcomers, Snap version available for non-Ubuntu distros seems to have some issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pablo S.
PS
Pablo S.
Owner
Computer & Network Security
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Excellent"
5/5
What do you like best about Canonical LXD?

optimization in the use of resources of the server, for the company it is important to be able to take full advantage of a server, without falling into underutilization. It is the software that occupies less resources, very close to the hardware, easy to configure, but it lacks a graphical interface for its administration. In our case we use it with high network availability. I recommend this software 100%, because having powerful servers to offer robust architectures for business is an imperative for any team working within a company.I think that in the near future, the fact of passing a container running from a machine A to a machine B, will be easy to use and quite simple. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?

sometimes the configurations are a bit complex and it lacks an administration and configuration interface Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Categories on G2
Explore More