# Which unified endpoint management tools save time through remote access and automated policy deployment?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Which UEM tools save the most time through remote access and automated policy deployment? For lean teams, that combination is the whole point. A few from the<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/unified-endpoint-management-uem"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/unified-endpoint-management-uem">unified endpoint management (UEM)</a> category:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/teamviewer/reviews"><strong>TeamViewer</strong></a>: reviewers rely on stable remote access to fix devices without traveling to them.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/suremdm-by-42gears/reviews"><strong>SureMDM by 42Gears</strong></a>: remote troubleshooting plus policy and profile push across a fleet from one console.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/airdroid-business/reviews"><strong>AirDroid Business</strong></a>: remote control and automated app and update deployment that lets small teams work exception-based.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/samsung-knox-suite/reviews"><strong>Samsung Knox Suite</strong></a>: zero-touch enrollment and remote management reviewers say cut on-site visits, for Samsung fleets.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">If you leaned on remote access and automated policies, which tool actually saved your team hours? And did automated deployment go smoothly, or need babysitting at scale?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 22 days ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Comparing the Unified Endpoint Management category on G2 for this remote-access-and-policy angle, the babysitting question the post raises at scale is the one worth taking most seriously, since remote access and automated deployment solve genuinely different problems, one saves time on individual device troubleshooting while the other saves time on fleet-wide consistency, and a tool being strong at one doesn&#39;t guarantee it&#39;s equally strong at the other. Zero-touch enrollment is a meaningfully different time-saver than remote troubleshooting, specifically, since it removes an entire category of manual setup work rather than making an existing manual task faster, which is why platform-specific tools built around a single device ecosystem tend to execute that particular capability more cleanly than a broader cross-platform tool. 

The babysitting risk at scale usually shows up less in the deployment mechanism itself and more in exception handling, which is what happens when a policy push fails silently on a subset of devices, since a tool that deploys smoothly to ninety percent of a fleet but requires manual follow-up on the rest hasn&#39;t actually saved the time it appears to on paper. For a lean team specifically, the more useful question than which tool saves the most hours in aggregate is probably which tool makes failures visible immediately, since that&#39;s what determines whether the time saved on the happy path gets eaten back up chasing exceptions.


##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 12 days ago
- Author title: Marketing





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4