# Which payment analytics platforms are highest rated for companies recovering lost revenue from payment failures?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Failed and declined payments are one of those quiet leaks that add up fast. So I've been digging into which<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/payment-analytics"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/payment-analytics">payment analytics platforms</a> reviewers rate highest for companies recovering that lost revenue, whether through dunning and retries or through smarter routing so fewer payments fail in the first place. Some highest-rated tools that kept coming up on G2 are:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/paddle/reviews"><strong>Paddle</strong></a> (4.5 out of 5): This one comes up most for recovery because, as a merchant of record, it builds in dunning and failed-payment recovery, and reviewers point to Paddle Retain following up on delinquent payments and adding a cancellation flow to cut involuntary churn. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/juspay/reviews"><strong>Juspay</strong></a> (4.6 out of 5): Rated highly for the routing side of the problem, reviewers credit its orchestration and routing logic across multiple gateways with reducing transaction failures and lifting conversion, so fewer payments drop before they complete. A couple mention the app UI and occasional support lag. If you've put it in front of real volume, how much did success rates move for you?</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/bluesnap/reviews"><strong>BlueSnap</strong></a> (4.1 out of 5): Reviewers describe it automatically picking the best bank so payments don't get declined for no reason, and one was struck to find that its Account Updater was quietly recovering revenue from expired cards they'd otherwise have lost. </li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For anyone who's actively evaluated or solved this, which approach recovered more for you, the dunning-and-retry route, or the smarter-routing route?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 18 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

From the finance folks I&#39;ve compared notes with, the two routes recover different money, so the answer depends on which leak is bigger. Dunning and retries recover subscription revenue from expired cards and soft declines over days. Smarter routing recovers checkout revenue in the moment, before the customer ever sees a failure. Subscription-heavy businesses tend to see more from dunning plus an account updater, while high-volume checkout businesses see more from routing. I&#39;d measure your involuntary churn against your decline rate and let the bigger number pick the tool.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 17 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4