# Which other health care operations systems have the strongest track record of on-time project delivery?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I'm trying to work out which systems in the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/other-health-care-operations">Other Health Care Operations Software category </a>on G2 actually deliver on time. Most products here are subscription software rather than delivered projects. So this is a checklist for evaluating delivery risk, not a ranking.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"><strong>What determines whether a healthcare implementation lands on time:</strong></p><ul>
<li>Whether the vendor or you own the EHR integration work, and who is waiting on whom</li>
<li>How long your security and compliance review takes — in healthcare this routinely exceeds the technical build</li>
<li>Whether the product is configured or built: ready-made apps deploy in weeks, custom development in quarters</li>
<li>Whether clinical staff have to change behaviour, since that timeline is yours to manage, not the vendor's</li>
<li>Whether the contract ties payment to milestones or to a start date</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">What each provider's model implies about delivery risk:</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/silna-health/reviews"><strong>Silna Health</strong></a>: Lowest structural delivery risk here, because it's a managed service: Silna's team runs the authorization process rather than handing you software to implement. There's no internal project to slip.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/data-research/reviews"><strong>Data+ Research</strong></a>: Ready-made apps to configure rather than build, with a drag-and-drop designer for non-technical users. </li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/catt-claim-adjudication-system/reviews"><strong>CATT Claim Adjudication System</strong></a>: Positioned as easy to install and configure, with consulting services and source-code purchase both offered; unusual flexibility if timeline control matters more than vendor management.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/accruent-tms/reviews"><strong>Accruent TMS</strong></a>: Deployed across 600+ healthcare organizations, so the delivery playbook is well-worn. The breadth of what it touches makes this the largest-scope implementation in the category.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/symplr-contract/reviews"><strong>symplr Contract</strong></a>: ERP integration is the longest pole in any tent. Plan around the finance system, not the contract tool.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">The realistic version: in healthcare, projects usually slip on security review and clinical change management, both of which sit on your side of the line. What actually caused your last healthcare implementation to run over?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 8 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;I’d challenge the idea that a managed service has “no internal project to slip.” Silna Health may remove much of the software implementation, but payer workflows, access, security approvals, and escalation rules still need to be established. The better test is probably time to the first authorization processed successfully, not a traditional go-live date.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 7 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4