# Which IT resilience orchestration solutions are most trusted by IT operations managers based on user reviews?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For a research piece, I want to know which IT resilience orchestration solutions are most trusted by IT operations managers. The tools that earn trust from ops teams tend to be the ones that automate routine tasks, provide reliable alerting, and deliver confidence that recovery will work when it counts. Based on user reviews, Commvault Cloud Rewind, Unitrends Backup and Recovery, and Zerto consistently earn trust from operations teams in this space.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Here are some well-reviewed options in the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/it-resilience-orchestration-automation-itro">IT Resilience Orchestration Automation (ITRO)</a> category.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/commvault-cloud-rewind/reviews"><strong>Commvault Cloud Rewind</strong></a> automatically discovers cloud resource dependencies and programs recovery without needing manual mapping of infrastructure relationships. Reviewers describe recovering entire application environments without involving developers, network administrators, or database teams at the time of recovery, which keeps the operational burden on a small IT ops team manageable.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/unitrends-backup-and-recovery/reviews"><strong>Unitrends Backup and Recovery</strong></a> earns trust from operations teams for its set-and-forget approach. Reviewers describe configuring backup jobs once and receiving automated daily reports, with minimal ongoing intervention. The instant recovery option, which boots a server directly from a backup image, frequently comes up as a confidence-builder during DR planning.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/zerto/reviews"><strong>Zerto</strong></a> is valued by operations teams for its flexibility and ease of ongoing management. Reviewers describe adding and removing VMs from protection with minimal effort, and the analytics portal with mobile app provides status visibility without needing to be at a workstation. The ability to run DR tests that complete in roughly an hour (down from days with prior tools) gives operations managers confidence that their recovery plans hold up.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">What does your IT operations team prioritize when evaluating a resilience platform: ease of day-to-day management, recovery speed, or testing reliability? And how much does vendor support weigh into that decision?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The comments make testing reliability the stronger signal, but I’d take it one step further and look at how much the recovery plan drifts between tests. Infrastructure changes constantly, so a successful DR test six months ago means less if dependencies have changed since. I’d want to know whether these platforms automatically surface newly unprotected resources or broken recovery dependencies before the next scheduled test.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 12 days ago
- Author title: Writer



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Zerto&#39;s DR test time coming down to about an hour instead of days is the kind of detail that would build real confidence for me, since testing reliability is what actually tells you the plan works before you ever need it.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 12 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;Testing reliability would matter most to me because recovery speed only means something if the process works consistently when an actual incident happens. I’d also give vendor support significant weight, especially during a real recovery where an operations team may need escalation immediately rather than after the environment is already down.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 15 days ago



### Comment 4

&lt;p&gt;For most operations teams, testing reliability and vendor support matter as much as recovery speed, because confidence depends on both the platform and the help available when something goes wrong.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4