# Which hybrid cloud storage platforms work best for software companies building data-intensive analytics apps that need fast read performance alongside reliable backup?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Question for the cloud storage reviewers and researchers here. Fast reads and reliable backup pull in opposite directions: speed wants your data close by, protection wants copies of it stored somewhere else entirely. I'm trying to pin down which hybrid cloud storage platforms manage both for software teams building data-heavy analytics apps.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Digging into<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/hybrid-cloud-storage-solutions"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/hybrid-cloud-storage-solutions">hybrid cloud storage solutions</a> category, three names keep coming up plus one for a specific worry:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/google-cloud-storage/reviews"><strong>Google Cloud Storage</strong></a>: the easy call if your analytics tools already run on Google. Reads are quick, and G2 reviewers rate its data security at the top of this category. But connecting it to your own servers is a user's problem to solve, and moving data back out of Google's cloud costs extra.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/netapp-ontap-data-management-software/reviews"><strong>NetApp ONTAP</strong></a>: keeps your most-used data close to your servers so apps stay fast, while copying everything to a second location for safekeeping. Closest fit to the question as asked, but it takes real storage expertise to set up and run.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/dell-flash-storage/reviews"><strong>Dell Flash Storage</strong></a>: posts the strongest speed scores in the category's feature data. The catch is that the speed comes from Dell hardware that you need to own, with the cloud behind it for backup and overflow. So you are buying equipment, not just a service.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/nasuni/reviews"><strong>Nasuni</strong></a>: here for the backup half. Instead of a nightly backup job, it saves a version of every file as it changes, so there is nothing to fail or forget. It suits teams working through lots of files more than apps that need split-second answers.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/sangfor-cloud-platform/reviews"><strong>Sangfor Cloud Platform</strong></a> tops the overall G2 grid in this space, but it’s more of a full private cloud platform than a storage layer for analytics, so I left it off.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For anyone who has researched or reviewed this space for real analytics load: which promise gives out first (the speed or the safety net), and why?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 9 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;From G2 reviews, the speed promise is first. G2 reviewers running real analytics workloads consistently describe latency surprises when data isn&#39;t in the local cache and has to pull from the cloud, with NetApp ONTAP&#39;s tiering being the most reliable at keeping hot data close but requiring the storage expertise to tune it correctly. For software teams that want both without a dedicated storage engineer, Google Cloud Storage paired with a caching layer gets the most mentions as the pragmatic path, though reviewers flag egress costs as the thing that quietly inflates the bill once analytics query volume scales.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 7 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4