# Which ETO ERP platforms are best for managing the transition from an engineering BOM to a manufacturing BOM in one system without manual handoffs between teams?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Which ETO ERP platforms are best for managing the transition from an engineering BOM to a manufacturing BOM in one system without manual handoffs between teams?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Here is the honest version of this problem. Engineering finishes a design. Someone exports something to a spreadsheet. Someone else on the manufacturing side re-enters or reformats that data into the ERP. Somewhere in that process, a quantity is wrong, an ECO is applied to one version but not the other, or a component is just missed. By the time anyone notices, the job is partially built. The tools that solve this make the EBOM-to-MBOM transition a system event rather than a human task.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">We are trying to understand which <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/eto-erp">ETO ERP</a> tools actually handle this end-to-end. What teams dealing with this transition seem to need:</p><ul>
<li>A live connection between CAD and the ERP's BOM, not a manual export step</li>
<li>Change order workflows that log what changed, when, and who approved it before production sees it</li>
<li>One environment for both EBOM and MBOM rather than two systems with a bridge between them</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">From what the reviews show:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/total-eto/reviews"><strong>Total ETO</strong></a><strong>:</strong> CAD integration is not a feature here, it is how the product is designed to work. Engineers release BOMs from within the CAD environment and the data flows through without re-entry. The SolidWorks add-in is mentioned by name in multiple reviews as the mechanism for transferring BOM information directly from models into the system.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/sap-ecc/reviews"><strong>SAP ECC</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Has the architecture to maintain EBOM and MBOM as linked but separate structures. The lineage tracking is described by reviewers as being able to trace a finished product back to its specific raw material purchase order and financial posting, which is the kind of end-to-end traceability that EBOM-to-MBOM management depends on at the compliance level.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/infor-syteline/reviews"><strong>Infor SyteLine</strong></a><strong>:</strong> The workflow automation tools are what reviewers say keep the engineering-to-production handoff from stalling. Automating the notification and approval logic around the handoff is at least as important as where the BOM data lives.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/ifs-cloud/reviews"><strong>IFS Cloud</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Reviewers describe low-code configuration that lets teams shape the workflow to match how engineering and production actually interact, rather than forcing the process to conform to what the system assumes.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For anyone who manages this transition today, what step creates the most downstream problems when it goes wrong?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 28 days ago
- Author title: Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Worth saying out loud that the EBOM and MBOM are different for good reasons, not because someone is sloppy. Engineering lists a weldment as one item. The floor needs plate sizes, cut lengths and consumables. So &quot;no manual handoff&quot; can&#39;t mean both teams share one BOM. What it should mean is that the translation between the two is stored in the system and reused, instead of living in someone&#39;s head and a spreadsheet. That&#39;s the real payoff: when an ECO hits the engineering side, the change flows through the same stored translation, instead of someone redoing the conversion by memory and hoping they did it the same way as last time.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 27 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4