# Which endpoint security services platforms level the playing field against advanced persistent threat actors?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">We're exploring which <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/endpoint-security-services">endpoint security service providers</a> give resource-constrained organizations access to APT-grade detection and response capabilities they couldn't build independently. These stood out:</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/cybriant/reviews"><strong>Cybriant</strong></a>: Best for mid-market organizations that need enterprise-grade APT defense. Offers zero-day intelligence before antivirus, MDR detection of ransomware that bypassed all other AV, and a cross-platform endpoint agent giving APT-level coverage at scale.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-security-x-force-threat-intelligence/reviews"><strong>IBM Security X-Force Threat Intelligence</strong></a>: Best for organizations needing nation-state-level threat intelligence. Provides advanced detection of Log4Shell and active global campaign tracking, giving organizations access to the same adversary intelligence that previously required an enterprise-scale security research investment.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/echelon-risk-cyber/reviews"><strong>Echelon Risk + Cyber</strong></a>: Best for building the organizational APT readiness that large enterprises fund natively. Gives realistic incident response tabletops, thorough penetration testing, and security maturity frameworks that close the structural gaps sophisticated attackers exploit.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/netsurion/reviews"><strong>Netsurion</strong></a>: Well-suited for organizations that need continuous 24x7 SOC coverage, they can't staff internally. Has proactive incident management, malware review support, and NIST-aligned security posture improvement that closes the monitoring gaps APT actors target.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/at-t-network-services/reviews"><strong>AT&amp;T Network Services</strong></a>: Well-suited for organizations wanting world-class expert backing 24x7. Offers global threat intelligence and SentinelOne endpoint coverage backed by AT&amp;T's cyber expert team.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Which capability has most effectively leveled the APT playing field for your organization — advanced intelligence, continuous SOC coverage, adversary simulation, or security program maturity?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;I think continuous SOC coverage closing the monitoring gap that APT actors specifically target is the lever that matters most for teams that can&#39;t staff 24x7 internally.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4


