# Which education HR systems consolidate faculty data and streamline annual review and tenure workflow processes?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I keep seeing the same problem in reviews: faculty data scattered across spreadsheets and personal files until one system consolidates it, which is usually the real blocker before a tenure or annual-review workflow can move any faster. Here's what I'd shortlist from <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/education-hr">education hr software</a>:</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/watermark-watermark-faculty-success/reviews"><strong>Watermark Faculty Success</strong></a>: best known for centralizing teaching, research, publications, and service into one faculty record. One reviewer said it "saved me a great deal of time, especially during annual reviews and accreditation processes," and another specifically called out the custom annual-review report feature. Does your tenure committee pull directly from that same data, or rebuild the packet separately?</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/jenzabar-one/reviews"><strong>Jenzabar One</strong></a>: best known for connecting faculty records to the broader HR system (payroll, benefits, employment history) across an entire campus, and one VP of finance said the system covers most student, faculty, and staff needs in one place, though its reviews focus more on registration and finance than review cycles specifically. Does anyone actually link the two systems, or keep them separate?</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/neogov-talent-management-suite/reviews"><strong>NEOGOV Talent Management Suite</strong></a>: best known for customizable department-level workflows, which is useful once a review or tenure process needs to route through several approvers with different requirements, though its evidence base leans more toward hiring workflows than faculty review specifically.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Which of these has actually shortened your annual review cycle, and by how much, once you account for the time it takes to get faculty comfortable entering their own data?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 8 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Honestly for the &quot;consolidate faculty data plus run annual review and tenure&quot; combo, Watermark Faculty Success is the name that fits best. Reviewers describe entering teaching, publications, service and grants once and then reusing it for annual evaluations and promotion and tenure, instead of chasing spreadsheets and emails. A couple of caveats worth knowing: the heavy customization can create inconsistencies between departments if you&#39;re not careful, and some folks feel a bit locked in once all their data lives there. Are you trying to fix the data mess first, or the review workflow itself? They&#39;re slightly different problems.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4