# Which education HR software is most reliable based on reviews from managers handling complex departmental workflows?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Here's what the reviews say about reliability for managers running complex, multi-department workflows, since "reliable" means something different depending on whether you're managing hiring, faculty review, or day-to-day campus operations:</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/neogov-talent-management-suite/reviews"><strong>NEOGOV Talent Management Suite</strong></a>: connects hiring and evaluation workflows across departments; a manager of selection and evaluation specifically praised customizing workflows to fit different departments' expectations, and it carries the highest NPS (44) of the products I looked at in this category.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/watermark-watermark-faculty-success/reviews"><strong>Watermark Faculty Success</strong></a>: solves faculty-review workflow specifically, with the highest satisfaction score (95) in the category, though setup takes real time upfront and the first year can feel heavy on data entry.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/jenzabar-one/reviews"><strong>Jenzabar One</strong></a>: connects finance, registration, and HR under one system for department heads, backed by consistently strong support reviews, though a recent interface update drew complaints about clutter and slowed down navigation for some admins.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">If you're a department chair or manager juggling hiring and faculty-review workflows at once, what made you pick your current platform, and what's the one lesson you'd pass on to someone starting from scratch?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Going by what administrators and managers actually write, it&#39;s a bit of a split. Watermark Faculty Success admins praise the responsiveness of the support and integration team and the custom reporting for complex review cycles, though the same folks note the setup is cumbersome and customization needs managing. NEOGOV admins lean positive on reliability and support for HR and hiring workflows, with the caveat of limited customization. So &quot;most reliable&quot; kind of depends on whether your complex workflows are faculty review cycles (Watermark) or HR and hiring processes (NEOGOV). What does the complexity actually look like on your end?&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4