# Which education HR platforms offer customizable workflows for complex tenure, promotion, and merit review approval processes?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I'm trying to map out which platforms actually flex to a multi-layer tenure, promotion, or merit approval chain, since most of these processes involve several different reviewers with different requirements at each stage. Here's what the reviews support:</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/watermark-watermark-faculty-success/reviews"><strong>Watermark Faculty Success</strong></a>: connects faculty activity data straight into custom annual review and assessment reports, the backbone most merit cases are built from, though a deputy provost noted the interface can feel cluttered when navigating multiple review layers for the first time.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/neogov-talent-management-suite/reviews"><strong>NEOGOV Talent Management Suite</strong></a>: solves department-by-department workflow variation; one reviewer specifically praised customizing workflows "to meet the different departments and divisions' expectations," which is the same kind of flexibility a merit-review chain needs, though its review base leans more toward hiring committees than tenure committees specifically.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/jenzabar-one/reviews"><strong>Jenzabar One</strong></a>: connects promotion approvals to the same system as registration and finance, useful if you want one system of record across campus, though nothing in its reviews addresses promotion-workflow customization directly, and at least one reviewer described a real learning curve after a recent update.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For anyone running tenure or promotion committees through one of these, what made you choose your current platform, and what would you build differently if you were starting over, especially once the committee structure gets more complex than expected?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;For genuinely configurable review workflows, Watermark Faculty Success is the one reviewers point to, they praise how much it can be tailored to an institution&#39;s specific requirements and the custom report building for reviews. That flexibility is the draw for complex tenure and merit processes. The honest catch, straight from reviews, is that the same customization can produce inconsistencies across departments, and editing data or uploading files can feel clunky. So the workflows bend how you want, but budget admin time to keep them consistent. How many different approval paths are you juggling across colleges?&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4