# Which decision making software is rated highest for streamlining operational workflows at scale for teams that have outgrown spreadsheets and ad hoc processes?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I'm researching which decision making tools hold up for streamlining operational workflows at scale, specifically for teams that have outgrown spreadsheets and ad hoc processes. </p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">A few from the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/decision-making">Decision-Making category</a> stand out on that front.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/flowforma-process-automation/reviews"><strong>FlowForma Process Automation</strong></a>: Digitizes and automates processes that were previously spreadsheet, paper, or email based, with approval flows and centralized records, and reviewers describe it running across large organizations. Some note the interface can feel dated and advanced work may need a bit of code.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/fibery/reviews"><strong>Fibery</strong></a>: A connected workspace that replaces a stack of separate tools and spreadsheets, linking data across teams with databases, formulas, and reports. The honest trade-off is a real setup and learning investment, so it rewards teams willing to configure it properly.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/airfocus-by-lucid/reviews"><strong>airfocus by Lucid</strong></a>: Handles prioritization and portfolio views across multiple teams, which helps once ad hoc tracking stops scaling. Its flexibility comes with a short configuration curve.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/1000minds/reviews"><strong>1000minds</strong></a>: Brings a structured, repeatable method to prioritizing large sets of work items, which reviewers use to rank dozens of projects consistently instead of by gut feel.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For teams past the spreadsheet stage, which of these actually scaled with you, and where did one start to strain as volume grew? If you consolidated several tools or sheets into one, what was the biggest thing that got easier?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 18 days ago
- Author title: Marketing
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;FlowForma seems like the strongest fit once spreadsheets and email approvals start breaking down, especially if the goal is to automate repeatable operational workflows. Fibery can scale further across teams, but the setup effort is higher; the biggest win would be having one source of truth instead of reconciling multiple sheets.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 days ago
- Author title: Marketer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4