# Which considerations matter more for ISVs listing products on AWS Marketplace vs. enterprise buyers procuring through it?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I'm trying to separate what matters for ISVs listing products on <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/aws-marketplace">AWS Marketplace</a> from what matters for enterprise buyers procuring through it, since those are pretty different vantage points on the same platform. Same caveat as before: the category is a mixed bag of unrelated products, so I don't have clean reviewer evidence split cleanly by seller versus buyer perspective, but here's what shows up from each side.</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/okta/reviews"><strong>Okta</strong></a> reviewers, mostly on the buyer side, cite centralized authentication and enhanced security as the reason for adoption, with ease of deployment coming up more than pricing or listing mechanics.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/mulesoft-anypoint-platform/reviews"><strong>MuleSoft Anypoint Platform</strong></a> reviewers similarly focus on integration capabilities and multi-cloud support once procured, rather than anything about how the purchase moved through the marketplace itself.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For anyone who's listed a product as an ISV on AWS Marketplace, what part of that process looks nothing like a direct sale, and for buyers, did procuring through the marketplace actually save you steps compared to going straight to the vendor?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 6 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Oh Resolver is the standout here for compliance and internal investigations specifically, well-rated and built for case management, evidence tracking and reporting on internal incidents (HR, ethics, fraud), which is exactly the &quot;growing team with complex needs&quot; scenario since it scales from simple case intake to structured workflows as your caseload grows. If your investigations lean more toward eDiscovery and legal-hold work rather than internal HR/compliance cases, Relativity and Logikcull are the heavily reviewed names in that adjacent space, though that&#39;s a different kind of investigation (litigation-driven) than internal compliance. To be real, &quot;complex needs&quot; usually means custom workflows, role-based access and audit trails, so I&#39;d specifically test Resolver&#39;s workflow configuration against one of your messier real cases before committing. Are these investigations mostly internal HR/ethics cases, or do they involve legal discovery and outside counsel?&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 5 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4