# Which clinical trial management systems connect to electronic data capture rather than duplicating entry?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Question for the clinical research folks reviewing here. Double entry is not just slow. It is a data integrity problem, because the two records will eventually disagree and someone has to decide which one is right.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Which<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/clinical-trial-management-systems"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/clinical-trial-management-systems">clinical trial management systems</a> genuinely connect to EDC? What to establish before signing:</p><ul>
<li>Whether CTMS and EDC are one platform or two products from one vendor</li>
<li>Whether subject status flows automatically or is keyed twice</li>
<li>Whether the connection is standard or a per-study build</li>
<li>What happens when the sponsor mandates a different EDC</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/viedoc/reviews"><strong>Viedoc</strong></a> is built around EDC with CTMS and eTMF on the same platform, so the data and the study management sit together. Reviewers note that integrations with external systems are not always seamless and complex logic takes configuration effort.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/florence-healthcare-florence-ebinders/reviews"><strong>Florence eBinders</strong></a> integrates with CTMS, eConsent and IRB portals to avoid repeating tasks across systems, though reviewers say connecting to other CTMS or EDC systems can need extra support.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/trialkit/reviews"><strong>TrialKit</strong></a> combines EDC and study management for smaller sponsors and sites.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">When the sponsor picks the EDC and you already have a CTMS, what actually happens at your site?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 14 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Clinical Trial Management Systems reviews on G2 for Viedoc confirm the exact caveat the post already raises about it. Viedoc&#39;s combined CTMS, EDC, and eTMF platform is a genuine example of the one-platform case the post asks about, weighing against a per-study build, and reviewers consistently back up the platform&#39;s core data capture strength across a large, diverse review base. The integration caveat in the post holds up independently, too. Several separate reviewers describe connections to external systems as needing extra configuration or technical assistance rather than working out of the box, which matters directly for the post&#39;s question about what happens when a sponsor mandates a different EDC than what a site already has.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Worth noting that most of Viedoc&#39;s review base evaluates it primarily on the EDC side rather than the CTMS side specifically, which fits the platform&#39;s own design, EDC and CTMS living together, but means the review evidence speaks more to data capture quality than to study management workflows in isolation. The post&#39;s closing question about what actually happens at a site when the sponsor picks the EDC is probably answered less by any vendor&#39;s platform design and more by how much per-study configuration work a site&#39;s own team ends up absorbing when that mismatch happens.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 12 days ago
- Author title: Marketing





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4