# Which carbon accounting platforms integrate with the tools already in use without a long migration?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Nobody wants a second system of record for data that already exists in finance, energy and procurement. The question is how the numbers get in, and whether they can be traced back when an auditor asks.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">So which<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/carbon-accounting"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/carbon-accounting">carbon accounting</a> platforms integrate with the tools already in use without a long migration? The routes in, roughly:</p><ul>
<li>Direct connections to utility and supplier portals, so bills arrive without anyone forwarding them</li>
<li>Spreadsheet and finance-system links that keep the source file as the source of truth</li>
<li>Manual upload with an audit trail, which is slower but easier to evidence</li>
<li>Platform hubs where carbon sits alongside the other reporting you already do there</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Three worth comparing:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/workiva-workiva/reviews"><strong>Workiva</strong></a> connects source data to the report itself, with version control, commenting and an Excel plug-in that pushes figures in from the files finance already maintains. Reviewers say self-led setup takes longer than expected, and that formula visibility across teams could be clearer.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/energy-elephant/reviews"><strong>Energy Elephant</strong></a> automates the import of new bills and metering rather than asking anyone to key them in, and its reporting is built against the common protocols and frameworks. Reviewers would like alerting when the system flags something rather than having to look.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/osapiens/reviews"><strong>osapiens</strong></a> sits as a hub across supply chain, ESG and compliance data, which suits organisations already reporting on more than carbon. Reviewers value that it keeps pace with changing regulatory requirements rather than needing reconfiguration each time.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For anyone who has been through assurance: which integration held up under questioning, and which one you ended up explaining by hand?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 8 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Energy Elephant automating bill and metering imports instead of asking someone to key everything in by hand is the piece that actually removes manual work rather than just relocating it.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 4 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4