# What virtual fitting platforms are most trusted by e-commerce managers, based on user reviews?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hey G2 users, we wanted to dig into which <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/virtual-fitting">virtual fitting platforms</a> are most trusted by e-commerce managers, since return rates from sizing mistakes are among the clearest costs this category is supposed to solve.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"><strong>MirrAR</strong>, <strong>Fittingbox</strong>, and <strong>Measmerize</strong> came up the most. Here's the fuller list:</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/mirrar/reviews"><strong>MirrAR</strong></a><strong>:</strong> 4.7 stars across 42 reviews, an AR-based virtual try-on solution built for retail conversion specifically.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/fittingbox/reviews"><strong>Fittingbox</strong></a><strong>:</strong> 4.7 stars across 13 reviews, powers one of the world's largest 3D frame databases with over 5,000 new eyewear frames digitized monthly.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/measmerize/reviews"><strong>Measmerize</strong></a><strong>:</strong> 4.9 stars across 6 reviews, the highest rating here on the smallest sample, reports cutting returns by 25 to 40% and boosting conversion 3 to 9x.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/3dlook/reviews"><strong>3DLOOK</strong></a><strong>:</strong> 4.5 stars across 12 reviews, generates 80+ body measurements from just two photos for precise sizing recommendations.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/easytry/reviews"><strong>EasyTry</strong></a><strong>:</strong> 4.2 stars across 10 reviews, the lowest rating here, offers try-on from a single photo using computer vision.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Given how small every sample in this category is, has anyone actually measured a real return-rate drop after implementing one of these, not just the vendor's own reported figure?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 7 days ago
- Author title: Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Your caution about sample sizes is fair, and there&#39;s a measurement issue underneath it too. Return rate moves for a lot of reasons at once, including seasonality and assortment changes, so a before-and-after comparison usually can&#39;t isolate the tool unless it was rolled out to part of the catalogue at a time. Anyone evaluating this category is probably better served asking vendors how their reported figures were measured than asking what the figure was. Also worth noting that Fittingbox&#39;s eyewear focus and 3DLOOK&#39;s body measurement approach are solving quite different sizing problems, so the numbers aren&#39;t really comparable across them.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 6 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4