# What's the highest-rated secure email gateway for financial services organizations with demanding security needs?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hi G2 users, I've been comparing <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/secure-email-gateway">secure email gateway</a> options for a financial services environment where the security bar sits well above average, and pulled the actual ratings rather than relying on vendor pitches.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/proofpoint-core-email-protection"><strong>Proofpoint Core Email Protection</strong></a> (4.6 stars, 601 reviews) earns strong marks for catching business email compromise attempts before they land, with financial services reviewers pointing specifically to its machine learning catching spoofing and spam proactively, often before anyone even sees the message.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/kiteworks"><strong>Kiteworks</strong></a> (4.4 stars, 120 reviews) is frequently cited for compliance-heavy environments, with reviewers highlighting granular access controls, file expiry, and detailed audit logging as central to proving compliance during regulatory reviews.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/mimecast-advanced-email-security"><strong>Mimecast Advanced Email Security</strong></a> (4.4 stars, 361 reviews) comes up often for its data retention and searchable archiving, which several financial services reviewers say meets regulatory retention requirements without needing a separate tool.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-secure-email-threat-defense"><strong>Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense</strong></a> (4.3 stars, 28 reviews) rounds out the group, with reviewers highlighting its flexibility across on-premises, virtual, and cloud deployments alongside integration with Cisco's broader security stack.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">What stands out is that financial services buyers seem to weigh compliance documentation as heavily as raw threat detection, which shapes this list a little differently than a general SMB comparison would.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Would love to know if anyone here has been through a regulatory audit using one of these and how the reporting side held up.</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 4 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;For financial services, I’d test the reporting workflow with the same seriousness as threat detection. Give the security team a simulated BEC incident from several months earlier and ask them to reconstruct what was detected, which controls acted, who investigated it, and what happened afterward. If producing that evidence requires stitching together exports from several consoles, the platform may protect email well without making a regulatory review equally manageable.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 4 days ago
- Author title: Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4