# What's the best VAR/reseller partner for organizations managing complex, multi-department operational needs as they scale?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Most partners here are deep in one layer. Finance runs on ERP, revenue runs on CRM, and analytics runs on a data platform — and the partners who are excellent at one of those are rarely the same firms who are excellent at the others. Scaling organizations tend to discover this after signing with one and finding the scope stops at a departmental boundary.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Looking at the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/other-vars">Other VARs category</a>, the three that come up most for scaling companies are <strong>MicroAccounting</strong>, <strong>Faye Business Systems Group</strong>, and <strong>OneSix</strong> — one per layer.</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/microaccounting/reviews"><strong>MicroAccounting</strong></a> — Sage 100 and Sage Intacct, ERP migration, cloud hosting, document management, and process automation. Strongest when finance is the constraint and Sage is the destination.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/faye-business-systems-group/reviews"><strong>Faye Business Systems Group</strong></a> — CRM, service desk, and integration work across a wide platform range. Strongest where sales, service, and support are diverging into separate systems.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/onesix/reviews"><strong>OneSix</strong></a> — Data strategy and engineering across Snowflake, AWS, Fivetran, and dbt. Strongest when the problem is that no two departments' numbers agree.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">The real question is single partner versus several. One partner means one relationship and a ceiling on expertise; several means better depth and an integration problem that becomes yours. Did you consolidate onto one partner as you scaled, or deliberately keep specialists per layer?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 18 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Beyond single-partner-versus-several, there&#39;s a sequencing question worth adding: OneSix&#39;s job, making departments&#39; numbers agree, can&#39;t really succeed until the ERP and CRM layers underneath are stable, since the data layer is only as trustworthy as the systems feeding it. Bringing in a data specialist before finance and CRM implementations have settled means redoing that reconciliation work later once those systems change again. So &quot;one per layer&quot; probably only works cleanly in a specific order, finance and CRM first, data layer once those are stable, rather than as three simultaneous specialist engagements.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 15 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4