# What .NET IDE platforms are most trusted by operations and engineering teams based on user reviews?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hi, .NET and DevOps folks on G2. Trust in a development tool is not built by a feature list. It is built at 2am, when a build breaks and the tool either helps or gets in the way. So I am asking which<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/net-integrated-development-environments-ide"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/net-integrated-development-environments-ide">.NET IDE</a> platforms operations and engineering teams actually trust, based on user reviews.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">One honest note first: this category mixes true IDEs with toolkits that live inside them. Both kinds show up below, and I have labeled which is which. Three names stand out in the review data: <strong>Visual Studio</strong>, <strong>Rider</strong>, and <strong>DevExpress</strong>.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/visual-studio/reviews"><strong>Visual Studio</strong></a> is the trust baseline. It leads the G2 Grid with thousands of reviews, and it earns that with built-in profiling, AI-assisted debugging, and Azure deployment tools that engineering teams use end to end. The honest caveat is that it’s Windows-first and heavy.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/rider/reviews"><strong>Rider</strong></a> has the smallest market presence of the true IDEs here, yet reviewers hand it the category's top feature scores for ease of use and file management. Cross-platform support on Windows, macOS, and Linux makes it the one ops teams can standardize across mixed machines.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/devexpress/reviews"><strong>DevExpress</strong></a> is not an IDE. It is a UI component suite that plugs into your IDE, and reviewers rate it remarkably well across the board, including the category's best score for patching and updates, which is exactly what ops teams care about.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/essential-studio/reviews"><strong>Essential Studio</strong></a> is the other toolkit, a large component library from Syncfusion with a big review base of its own.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Does your answer change if your shop is Windows-only versus spread across macOS and Linux, and which of these has actually earned trust in your team, not just stars?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 12 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The answer absolutely changes with the machine mix. Windows-only, Visual Studio is the trust default and hard to argue with. Spread across macOS and Linux, Rider is the only true IDE you can standardize on, so the question answers itself. One thing worth stealing from your toolkit note: a decent share of &quot;the IDE keeps breaking at 2am&quot; investigations end at a component library, not the IDE. Predictable patching from that layer, which is where DevExpress scores well, buys more trust than another star on the editor.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 10 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4