# What is the cheapest audio editing software that is still good enough to produce tracks worth releasing on Spotify without them sounding amateur?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">There's a real gap between tools that are technically capable of exporting audio and tools that can actually help you produce something that holds up on a streaming platform. Researching the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/audio-editing">audio editing software</a> category with this specific question in mind, the answer depends heavily on whether you're working on music, spoken word, or something in between. The budget options that work well for podcast production don't always have the mixing depth needed for a music release.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">A few tools come up repeatedly when producers talk about what they used before they could afford a full professional setup:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/audacity/reviews"><strong>Audacity</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Free and powerful enough for recording, editing, and exporting in the formats Spotify requires. Reviewers point out its limitations in non-destructive workflows, but many indie releases have been finished in it. The main gap is mastering: getting loudness normalized to streaming standards takes extra steps.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/garageband/reviews"><strong>GarageBand</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Also free, Mac-only, and includes a surprisingly capable set of built-in instruments, effects, and a mastering-ready export path. For solo artists working on vocals or acoustic material, it covers a lot of ground at zero cost.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/logic-pro-x/reviews"><strong>Logic Pro X</strong></a><strong>:</strong> One-time purchase, no subscription, and professional mastering tools included. Compared to subscription-based DAWs, the total cost of ownership over a few years makes it genuinely competitive for serious home producers.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/ableton-live/reviews"><strong>Ableton Live</strong></a><strong>:</strong> The Intro tier is affordable, and its strength in electronic and loop-based production makes it a popular choice for artists producing in those genres. Has Spotify-ready export built in.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">What's the tipping point where the free tools stop working and the paid ones start to justify their cost for music specifically?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 28 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

To be really honest, the tool isn&#39;t what makes a track sound amateur, the mixing does. Audacity is free and plenty of released music and podcasts have been cut on it. GarageBand is free on Mac and good enough to master something releasable. If you want to grow into real mixing without a subscription, Reaper is cheap and full-featured. So &quot;cheapest good enough&quot; is basically free, the money question is whether you&#39;ll learn to mix. What are you producing, music or spoken word? That changes the pick.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 28 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4


