# What are the top-rated web content management platforms for marketing teams publishing without a developer deploying?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hi, marketing and web teams on G2, plus anyone who has had a landing page sit in a queue behind a sprint.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Curious about the top-rated<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/web-content-management"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/web-content-management">web content management</a> platforms for marketing teams publishing without a developer deploying, and I am after views from people publishing weekly rather than evaluating annually.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">The split that matters is whether a page change is content or a code deployment. Three that come up most:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/umbraco/reviews"><strong>Umbraco</strong></a> (4.5) is the open-source .NET option where developers build the templates and editors work in a clean backend, with reviewers describing new pages going from a day or two down to minutes. They also mention template changes sometimes needing a server restart to appear, and documentation that can be hard to navigate.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/webflow/reviews"><strong>Webflow</strong></a> (4.4) puts design and publishing in the same visual tool, which is why marketing teams often own it outright.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/wordpress-org/reviews"><strong>WordPress.org</strong></a> (4.4) remains by far the most reviewed platform here, with the largest plugin ecosystem and the widest pool of people who already know it.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For marketers: what still needs a developer on your site, and is it the thing you expected?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 6 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;From what I&#39;ve gathered, the thing that still needs a developer is rarely the new landing page itself, it&#39;s usually a new content type or layout structure that doesn&#39;t already exist as a template, since that&#39;s a genuine build rather than something an editor can assemble from existing blocks. That tends to surprise people, since they expect the developer bottleneck to be about frequency of publishing, when it&#39;s actually about whether the page they want fits inside the structure that already exists.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 5 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4