# What are the top-rated corporate tax platforms for finance teams handling provision and compliance in one system?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hi, corporate tax and finance reviewers on G2, this one's for you. Looking for platforms that hold tax provision and compliance in one system rather than a provision tool bolted onto a separate filing tool. Checking the<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/corporate-tax"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/corporate-tax">Corporate Tax</a> category with that specifically in mind.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Three worth naming:<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/insightsoftware-longview-tax/reviews"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/insightsoftware-longview-tax/reviews"><strong>Longview Tax</strong></a>,<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/vertex-inc-vertex/reviews"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/vertex-inc-vertex/reviews"><strong>Vertex</strong></a>, and<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/thomson-reuters-onesource/reviews"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/thomson-reuters-onesource/reviews"><strong>Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE</strong></a>.</p><ul>
<li>
<strong>Longview Tax</strong> (4.3/5, 23 reviews) is consistently praised for provision speed and reporting depth, especially for BEPS Pillar Two work. The steady complaint across reviews is a real learning curve and no free trial to test that curve before buying.</li>
<li>
<strong>Vertex</strong> (4.4/5, 466 reviews) scores well ahead of category peers on ease of administration and support quality, though reviews flag a genuinely complex interface once you're past basic setup.</li>
<li>
<strong>Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE</strong> is the enterprise default for teams already inside the Thomson Reuters ecosystem, with reviews skewing heavily toward large accounting teams rather than small finance shops.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Anyone running provision and compliance through one of these end to end, does keeping it in one system actually save time, or does it just move the complexity around?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 5 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;I’d expect one system to save the most time when provision data can flow directly into compliance without another reconciliation cycle. If finance still has to export, re-map, and validate the same tax data before filing, the consolidation hasn’t removed much work. I’d test one entity from provision through return preparation and count the manual handoffs that remain.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4


