# What are the most trusted Oracle PeopleSoft resellers by CHROs and HR leaders based on user reviews?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">CHROs and HR leaders don't usually leave the reviews themselves, so trying to answer this for <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/oracle-peoplesoft-resellers">oracle peoplesoft resellers</a> is more about tracing which resellers show up with senior, HR-adjacent, or executive-level reviewers attached to their PeopleSoft-relevant work. A few names had that kind of reviewer behind them.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/mipro/reviews"><strong>MIPRO</strong></a> has multiple reviews written by people who sound like the client-side decision maker rather than a project team member, including one from a healthcare organization describing a repeat partnership across several projects. Does that kind of long-running, repeat-engagement trust actually scale past a mid-size org though?</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/tata-consultancy-services/reviews"><strong>Tata Consultancy Services</strong></a> has a reviewer specifically tagged as an executive sponsor, describing a good track record on large-scale execution and calling it a safe option for a Fortune 500 company.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/capgemini-services/reviews"><strong>Capgemini</strong></a> reviewers include people describing HCM-specific rollouts and faster HR ticket resolution after implementation, though it's not clear from the reviews whether those were HR leaders themselves or IT staff supporting HR.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/infosys-implementation-services/reviews"><strong>Infosys Implementation Services</strong></a> reviewers describe reliable, well-documented delivery, which HR leaders evaluating a long-term partner would probably care about. Is documentation quality actually a proxy for trust here, or just for smoother handoffs?</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">If you're a CHRO or HR director who picked one of these for a PeopleSoft project: what made you trust them specifically, the reference calls, the review base, or something else entirely that doesn't show up in a G2 rating?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 21 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

The angle on reviewer seniority is interesting. Trust at that level usually correlates with consistency over multiple engagements, especially when partners are involved beyond implementation into optimization and long-term roadmap planning.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 21 days ago
- Author title: Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4