# What are the most trusted AI Chatbots by customer support leaders based on user reviews?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Trust here means something specific: a leader needs confidence that the bot won't invent answers, won't leave customers stranded, and will actually reduce ticket load rather than just relocate it. Looking at reviewer accounts in the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/ai-chatbots">AI Chatbots category</a>, two names came up most consistently for genuine customer support trust: Tidio and Podium.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/tidio/reviews"><strong>Tidio</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Reviewers highlight the ability to reassign, reopen, and track chats without creating duplicate tickets, and its Lyro AI agent hands off to a human when it's uncertain rather than guessing, which reviewers credit with building trust between the bot and customers.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/podium/reviews"><strong>Podium</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Reviewers in regulated industries like insurance specifically value the phone call recording and transcript features to avoid misunderstandings and describe them as centralizing customer communication that used to be scattered across tools.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For leaders who've rolled one of these out company-wide: how long did it take before your team actually trusted the bot's handoffs enough to stop double-checking every escalation?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 7 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The &quot;when do teams stop verifying every escalation&quot; question usually resolves through sampling, not time. Leaders stop checking every handoff once they can check a random slice of them cheaply, which means the underrated feature is whether escalations come with the bot&#39;s reasoning attached: what it was asked, what it was unsure about, why it handed off. A bot that escalates correctly but opaquely gets verified forever; one whose handoffs are auditable in thirty seconds earns trust in weeks. Has anyone actually formalized that, like reviewing 10% of handoffs weekly until the error rate justified stopping?&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 7 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4