# What are the most reliable load balancing platforms based on reviews from high-traffic tech companies focused on minimizing downtime?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For high-traffic tech companies focused on minimizing downtime, I sorted the load balancers in G2's<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/load-balancing"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/load-balancing">load balancing</a> category by rating and pulled reliability themes.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/haproxy/reviews"><strong>HAProxy</strong></a> (4.7, 912 reviews): reviewers call it bulletproof, removing unhealthy servers automatically to prevent errors.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/akamai-cloud-computing/reviews"><strong>Akamai Cloud Computing</strong></a> (4.6, 406 reviews): a global platform reviewers lean on for reliable delivery and DDoS defense, broader than a pure load balancer.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/f5-nginx/reviews"><strong>F5 NGINX</strong></a> (4.6, 113 reviews): reviewers cite 99.99 percent availability during peak bursts.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/cloudflare-application-security-and-performance/reviews"><strong>Cloudflare Application Security and Performance</strong></a> (4.5, 743 reviews): a global edge reviewers say stays reliable and absorbs traffic spikes.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/aws-elastic-load-balancing/reviews"><strong>AWS Elastic Load Balancing</strong></a> (4.5, 96 reviews): reroutes around failed instances without affecting users.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For high-traffic teams, which kept downtime lowest under real load? And was reliability about the load balancer itself, or the health checks and failover behind it?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 8 days ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The load balancer matters, but reliability usually comes from the whole failover design around it: health checks, redundancy, autoscaling, and multi-zone architecture. I’d judge these platforms by how quickly they detect and route around failures under peak load, not just by uptime claims.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 4 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4