# What are the best Voice Recognition platforms for teams managing complex workflows without dedicated IT staff?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I've been researching what are the best Voice Recognition platforms for teams managing complex workflows without dedicated IT staff, since a lot of tools in this space assume there's someone technical around to handle setup and troubleshooting. Otter.ai, Krisp, and Rev are the three most often mentioned for teams without that support.</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/otter-ai/reviews"><strong>Otter.ai</strong></a>: straightforward setup with calendar and meeting tool integrations that don't require technical configuration.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/krisp/reviews"><strong>Krisp</strong></a>: works as a lightweight layer on top of existing call and meeting tools rather than requiring a separate platform to manage.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/rev/reviews"><strong>Rev</strong></a>: combines automated transcription with human review options, useful when accuracy matters more than DIY setup.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/notta/reviews"><strong>Notta</strong></a>: simple enough for non-technical teams to get running without much onboarding.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/deepgram/reviews"><strong>Deepgram</strong></a>: more developer-oriented, better suited to teams with at least some technical capacity despite not having dedicated IT.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For teams running this without IT support, what actually broke first, the setup or the ongoing maintenance?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 2 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;For us it was ongoing maintenance more than initial setup. Getting Otter.ai running took an afternoon, but keeping meeting integrations current as our other tools changed took more attention than we expected going in.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 23 hours ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4