# What are the best retail execution platforms for brands verifying shelf compliance across stores they do not own?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hi, field and trade marketing teams on G2, plus reviewers who send reps into accounts their brand has no control over. I am after the best<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/retail-execution"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/retail-execution">retail execution</a> platforms for brands verifying shelf compliance across stores they do not own, and would value input from people checking planograms in someone else's aisle.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">The awkward part of this category is authority. You agreed a planogram with head office, but the store team answers to the retailer, so all you really have is evidence and a relationship. Three that come up most:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/gospotcheck-by-form/reviews"><strong>GoSpotCheck by FORM</strong></a> (4.7) combines task management with image recognition and photo reporting, so a visit produces a consistent record rather than free-text notes. Reviewers running large field teams value that every submission comes back in the same format, which is what makes comparison across accounts possible.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/repsly/reviews"><strong>Repsly</strong></a> (4.3) covers scheduling, route planning, data collection and order entry, with photos labelled against each location so a rep can see exactly where they left off. Reviewers say it repays exploring the interface properly before rolling it out.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/wiser-solutions/reviews"><strong>Wiser Solutions</strong></a> (4.3) approaches shelf intelligence from the data side, pairing in-store observations with pricing and online visibility. Reviewers mention onboarding partners onto the system takes some effort.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For anyone auditing shelves in accounts you do not own: what actually gets a store to fix a display, the photo or the relationship?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 8 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The photo gives you evidence, but the relationship is usually what gets the correction made. I’d prioritize platforms that make photo proof consistent and easy to escalate, while giving reps enough context to follow up with the right store contact instead of treating compliance as a one-time audit.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 7 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4


