# What are the best automation testing platforms for QA engineers testing cross-browser compatibility without physical devices?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hi G2 community, testing every browser, OS, screen size, and device combination gets expensive fast when QA teams have to maintain the hardware themselves. I wanted to see which <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/automation-testing">automation testing platforms</a> reviewers actually use to get broad cross-browser coverage without building an in-house device lab.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Looking at the <strong>G2 Grid report for Automation Testing</strong> and reviews around browser, device, and cloud testing, these stood out:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/browserstack/reviews"><strong>BrowserStack</strong></a><strong>:</strong> QA reviewers repeatedly highlight real-device and cross-browser testing without buying or maintaining physical hardware.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/testsigma/reviews"><strong>Testsigma</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Users like having web, mobile, desktop, and API automation together, with cloud execution and low-code test creation.</li>
<li>
<strong>Katalon:</strong> Automation engineers value one platform for web, mobile, API, and desktop testing, with an interface that reduces setup and scripting effort.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/applitools/reviews"><strong>Applitools</strong></a><strong>:</strong> SDETs highlight its Ultrafast Test Grid for checking layouts across multiple browsers, viewports, and mobile devices without maintaining testing infrastructure.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">BrowserStack has the clearest review signal for the exact “no physical devices” problem. Several QA and SDET reviewers specifically mention accessing real devices remotely, testing across browser versions, and avoiding the cost and hassle of maintaining a device lab.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For QA teams doing cross-browser testing every release, how much does a real-device cloud change the workflow? Have you found virtual environments good enough, or is access to actual hardware still important for catching compatibility issues?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 3 days ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Automation Testing reviews on G2 for BrowserStack specifically back up the post&#39;s confident read on it more than usual. The pattern holds up consistently across the category; reviewers repeatedly describe eliminating the need for a physical device lab and testing real hardware without owning it, which lines up closely with the exact problem this post is asking about. The recurring caveat, and it shows up often enough to matter, is occasional lag or input delay during live remote sessions, especially on older devices or under high demand, which is worth weighing against the hardware savings rather than assuming the cloud experience is identical to local testing.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Katalon and Testsigma both lean toward consolidating multiple testing types into one interface rather than specifically emphasizing real-device breadth, which makes them a different kind of answer to a slightly different question than the one this post is asking. Whether virtual environments are good enough probably depends on what&#39;s being tested, since layout and compatibility issues show up fine on emulated environments, but timing-sensitive interactions are exactly where reviewers say the remote-session lag becomes noticeable.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 days ago
- Author title: Marketing





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4