# OutSystems vs Mendix vs Microsoft Power Apps for a mid-market company that wants to build custom apps without building a full dev team?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">This is a comparison that comes up a lot when researching <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/low-code-development-platforms">low-code development platforms</a> for mid-market companies. Three platforms with very different positioning, different developer experience assumptions, and different cost structures. The mid-market Grid shows all three as Leaders, but the stories reviewers tell are quite different.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/outsystems/reviews"><strong>OutSystems</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Mid-market enterprise reviewers describe it as genuinely powerful for building production-grade applications without a full dev team, with the visual development model compressing what would normally be weeks of work into hours. The AI-assisted development features are increasingly cited as useful for scaffolding and integration work. The cost is the recurring concern, with reviewers noting that licensing makes most sense for high-value, high-change applications rather than small internal tools. Is the architecture investment worth it if your dev team is small?</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/mendix/reviews">Mendix</a><strong>:</strong> Mid-market reviewers describe it as a serious low-code platform for building enterprise-grade custom apps, with strong multi-cloud deployment options and a development model that scales from citizen developer work to professional developer builds. It tends to attract reviewers who want the depth of a development platform without building a full engineering team from scratch.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-power-apps/reviews"><strong>Microsoft Power Apps</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Mid-market reviewers consistently describe the speed of going from idea to working app, sometimes the same day, and the frictionless integration with SharePoint, Teams, and Excel. The ceiling appears when apps get complex: multiple simultaneous users, large datasets, or advanced integrations all surface performance and licensing friction. For mid-market companies already in Microsoft 365, the economics are hard to argue with for the right class of applications.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">The honest difference seems to come down to what "custom apps" means. Power Apps is excellent for lightweight to medium-complexity tools inside Microsoft's ecosystem. OutSystems and Mendix are better suited when the apps need to be genuinely complex, long-lived, and owned by a small team that isn't a full dev shop but isn't completely non-technical either.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Which of these three have you evaluated for mid-market use, and what did the total cost of ownership picture look like after 12 months?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;I feel that the framing in the post is the right one: &quot;custom app&quot; is doing a lot of work in this comparison. It&#39;s really three different buying decisions:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent;&quot;&gt;Lightweight tools living inside an ecosystem you already pay for.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent;&quot;&gt;Complex, long-lived apps owned by a lean team that isn&#39;t a full dev shop.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent;&quot;&gt;Everything in between, which is where most of the mismatch happens.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;Picking a brand before defining which of those you&#39;re building is how teams end up over-tooled or hitting a ceiling a year in. What the app need to still do in year three is usually the clarifying question.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 26 days ago
- Author title: Marketing





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4