# JumpCloud vs Okta for a mid-size company that needs cloud directory and identity management without paying for an enterprise IAM suite?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">JumpCloud vs Okta for a mid-size company that needs cloud directory and identity management without paying for an enterprise IAM suite: after reading a year of reviews side by side, the verdict on this one is cleaner than most versus questions. JumpCloud when you want directory plus device management in one bill, Okta when identity integration breadth is the whole job and devices are handled elsewhere. Both are 4.5 rated with mid-market as their largest reviewer segment, so the split is about architecture and how the costs stack, and this is exactly the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/cloud-directory-services">cloud directory services</a> matchup where the pricing cons in reviews do most of the talking. Here's how the two compare:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/jumpcloud/reviews"><strong>JumpCloud</strong></a> (4.5/5.0, 4,017 reviews): The consolidation case. Mid-size reviewers describe directory, SSO, MFA, RADIUS, and MDM replacing three or four separate tools, with reviewers noting a la carte purchasing that avoids paying for unused modules, plus a free trial that helps scope needs. The cost complaint pattern is about upper tiers and per-user module stacking; the capability complaint pattern is a smaller SSO app catalog than competitors and SAML or SCIM customization limits on complex SaaS integrations.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/okta/reviews"><strong>Okta</strong></a> (4.5/5.0, 1,304 reviews): The integration-depth case. Reviewers in the window repeatedly cite pre-built connectors covering nearly every mainstream SaaS tool, ten minute app onboarding, and on-prem repository support scoring 9.4 versus the 8.7 category average. The enterprise-pricing worry in this question is legitimate per its own reviewers: modular licensing where costs ramp quickly as you add adaptive MFA, workflows, or privileged access, unclear feature-to-plan mapping, and some reviewers flatly listing high costs as not ideal for smaller organizations. No device management, so budget a separate MDM.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">The tiebreaker I would pose back: count the tools each would retire. If Okta plus your existing MDM costs less than JumpCloud's bundle, Okta's catalog depth wins. If you are buying an MDM anyway, JumpCloud's math usually looks better at mid-size. For teams that ran this exact evaluation, what did the two quotes actually come out to per user once MFA and lifecycle automation were included, and did anyone migrate from one to the other rather than choosing fresh?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 29 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The tiebreaker framing here is exactly right. The question isn&#39;t really JumpCloud vs Okta, it&#39;s whether you need MDM or not, and that almost decides it on its own.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 22 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4