# Is AudienceView Professional worth it for theater venue management?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Is AudienceView Professional worth it for <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/theater-venue-management">theater venue management</a>? This is worth answering plainly rather than just listing features, since the reviews actually split pretty clearly between very happy long-term users and a smaller group describing real limitations.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/audienceview-professional/reviews"><strong>AudienceView Professional</strong></a>: the majority of reviewers describe it as flexible, reliable, and well supported, with one organization specifically crediting a smooth four-year-old conversion and ongoing updates for keeping their team's daily operations running without interruption. The real complaints cluster around a few specific gaps, no cash drawer integration, limited full-map visibility during sales, and pricing that feels high if you're not using the full feature set.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/thundertix/reviews"><strong>ThunderTix</strong></a>: for comparison, reviewers describe a similar core ticketing and box office experience at a generally lower price point, though it's built more around subscription pricing than the deeper donor and membership layering AudienceView offers.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/tessitura/reviews"><strong>Tessitura</strong></a>: for organizations outgrowing a simpler platform, reviewers describe Tessitura as the next step up in complexity and cost, unifying ticketing with fundraising and analytics at a scale AudienceView's typical smaller nonprofit reviewer base doesn't usually need.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For anyone who actually adopted AudienceView Professional recently: did it end up being worth the cost and the learning curve for your organization's size, or did you find yourself using only a fraction of what it offers?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 8 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The cost you&#39;re really weighing is the donor and membership layer stacked on top of ticketing, and that only pays off if fundraising actually runs through it rather than a separate donor CRM. If development lives in its own system like Salesforce or Bloomerang, you&#39;re paying for a layer you&#39;ll never fill, which is exactly the &quot;expensive, using a fraction&quot; complaint, except the cause is an architecture choice, one unified patron record versus best-of-breed, not feature overkill. Put plainly: if donors get entered in two places, you&#39;ve bought the pricey half of a suite to run it as a plain ticketer, and a cheaper ticketing-first tool does the job you&#39;re actually using.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 6 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4