# Duck Creek Policy vs Guidewire PolicyCenter for a mid-sized carrier evaluating underwriting and rating platforms: which is worth building the core policy administration workflow around long-term?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Duck Creek Policy vs Guidewire PolicyCenter for a mid-sized carrier evaluating underwriting and rating platforms: which is worth building the core policy administration workflow around long-term? I've spent time in the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/underwriting-rating"><strong>underwriting and rating software</strong></a> category on exactly this comparison, and for a mid-sized carrier the honest evidence is thinner than either sales team will admit: both review bases skew enterprise and engineer-heavy, and the mid-sized experience mostly has to be inferred. Here's how the two compare on what actually exists:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/duck-creek-policy/reviews"><strong>Duck Creek Policy</strong></a> (4.6 stars, 118 reviews): The scores favor it for a team without an army: the higher rating on the larger base, a 9.4 G2 ease-of-use score against PolicyCenter's 8.4, and 9.1 support against 8.0, with full quote-to-cancellation lifecycle scope (vendor-stated). What a mid-sized buyer should weigh against that: no recent reviews landed to confirm the current experience, and its page cons name system complexity, API limitations, and extra implementation and maintenance costs, which are exactly the line items that hurt most at mid-size.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/guidewire-policycenter/reviews"><strong>Guidewire PolicyCenter</strong></a> (4.2 stars, 39 reviews): The current evidence is real and two-sided: recent reviews confirm the declarative product model, reusable rating definitions, and built-in policy workflows working, and equally confirm high cost and total ownership, complicated implementations, and ramp-up time, from reviewers with no reason to exaggerate either way. For long-term specifically, one relevant recent signal comes from its suite sibling: a smaller carrier on Guidewire's cloud describes upgrades getting simpler and vendor consolidation paying off, while admitting return on investment remains hard to measure two years in. That's the most honest long-term data point in this whole comparison.</li>
<li>For a mid-sized carrier, the long-term question decomposes into three that reviews can't answer and references can: what does year-two-and-beyond cost look like at your premium volume, how much specialist talent does each platform demand that you'd be renting forever, and what happens to your customizations at every upgrade. Ask each vendor for two carriers within 50% of your size, live for three or more years, and ask those carriers all three.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">My read: PolicyCenter is the proven-capability choice whose recent reviewers tell you plainly to budget heavy for implementation and ownership, and Duck Creek is the on-paper better fit for mid-sized friction whose current experience nobody has recently reviewed. Building your core around either long-term is less about this versus and more about which vendor's references at your size survive the three questions above.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Mid-sized carrier folks, if you're live on either, what did year two actually cost relative to the implementation quote, and would you build on the same platform again?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 18 days ago
- Net upvotes: 2


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;For mid-sized specifically, Guidewire&#39;s recent reviews offer the clearest long-term signal: reviewers describe cloud upgrades getting simpler and vendor consolidation paying off, while noting ROI takes time to show. Duck Creek scores well on ease of use and support, with lighter recent activity to confirm it. On the year-two question, the useful things to probe are the specialist staffing each platform expects and how customizations carry through upgrades, since those shape ongoing cost more than the license.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 14 days ago
- Author title: Marketer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4