# Best IoT Platforms for SaaS companies building scalable connected product solutions

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">SaaS teams building a connected product usually aren't just picking device firmware, they're picking the connectivity and device-management layer their whole business scales on. Here's what reviewers on the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/iot-platforms">IoT Platforms category on G2</a> say about three platforms built for that kind of scale.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/datoms/reviews">DATOMS</a> (4.7★, 71 reviews, Grid Leader): reviewers describe an OEM-friendly, white-label connected asset management platform, with one reviewer specifically praising highly customizable, brandable dashboards and multiple security certifications built for scaling across device categories. The tradeoff reviewers mention most is occasional device delivery delays and network lag.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/hologram/reviews">Hologram</a> (4.5★, 63 reviews, Grid High Performer): reviewers who resell IoT connectivity as part of their own SaaS product describe managing hundreds of SIMs across multiple clients through Hologram's API, including building their own white-label reseller portal on top of it. The gap reviewers flag is the lack of an official built-in reseller/billing platform.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/pelion-iot-connectivity/reviews">Pelion IoT Connectivity</a> (4.3★, 147 reviews, Grid Leader): reviewers highlight centralized, single-SIM management across 600+ networks that lets them launch a global connected-product business without negotiating with local carriers country by country. Reviewers flag that pricing gets expensive in territories outside Pelion's core plans.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For SaaS teams building on top of one of these: are you optimizing more for white-label/reseller flexibility, global connectivity reach, or OEM-grade device management at scale?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 12 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;For SaaS companies, the deciding factor is usually which layer you want to own versus outsource. I’d compare white-label flexibility, API depth, global connectivity coverage, device fleet management, and how predictable costs stay as deployments scale—because the wrong platform can create switching pain long after the first devices are live.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 12 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4