Business Process Management Software Resources

Articles, Glossary Terms, Discussions, and Reports to expand your knowledge on Business Process Management Software

Resource pages are designed to give you a cross-section of information we have on specific categories. You'll find articles from our experts, feature definitions, discussions from users like you, and reports from industry data.

Contents

Business Process Management Software Articles

Trends 2021 Followup: No-Code And Low-Code Market Signals

It’s been over six months since G2 published its 2021 digital trends series. That means more than half a year ago, my fellow analysts and I put our most overconfident hats on and called some shots for our respective B2B software markets.

by Adam Crivello

2021 Trends in Software Development

This post is part of G2's 2021 digital trends series. Read more about G2’s perspective on digital transformation trends in an introduction from Michael Fauscette, G2's chief research officer and Tom Pringle, VP, market research, and additional coverage on trends identified by G2’s analysts.

by Adam Crivello

Automating HR with Robotic Process as a Service

To work in human resources is to be inundated with repetitive, time-intensive and error-sensitive tasks, day in and day out. Fortunately, it’s become easier to automate these tedious tasks and allow HR personnel to focus their time and energy on expanding their strategic and creative thinking.

by Courtney Moran

Business Process Management Software Glossary Terms

Business Process Management (BPM)

Business process management (BPM) is a discipline that uses various methods to discover, model, analyze, measure, improve, and optimize business processes.

by Keerthi Rangan

Risk Identification

Risk identification detects and records potential harm to business assets or systems. Learn about its elements, types, best practices, and benefits.

by Holly Landis

Process Management

Process management is how businesses analyze and optimize their systems and workflows. Learn more about the five stages and best practices.

by Kelly Fiorini

Business Process Management Software Discussions

Are there BPM platforms that give a small operations team process automation capabilities without a six-figure implementation or an annual enterprise contract?

I’m researching whether there are BPM platforms that give a small operations team process automation capabilities without a six-figure implementation or an annual enterprise contract. The practical question is whether smaller teams can still get approval flows, form-based intake, basic integrations, and process visibility.

Looking at G2’s Small-Business BPM Grid, these options seem accessible:

Jotform Workflows is a Small-Business Grid Leader rated 4.5 stars, with reviewers mentioning lower cost, fast setup, and no steep learning curve.
Cflow supports approvals, procurement, and invoice routing without a developer, with SOC 2 Type 2 and HIPAA compliance.
Quixy helps teams automate departmental workflows quickly without external developers.
Microsoft Power Automate can be cost-effective for teams already on Microsoft 365, though premium connectors can raise costs.
Kissflow is straightforward to administer, but smaller organizations report mixed pricing feedback.

I’d like to know what the first six months actually cost in time, tools, and setup.

Totally doable now, the enterprise-contract-or-nothing era is over for basic process automation. The thing to watch isn't the sticker price, it's the implementation and "success" fees that quietly dwarf the license. Plenty of lighter tools let a small team self-serve without a consultant. Real question: how standard are your processes? Common shapes fit an off-the-shelf tool. Genuinely weird ones move the cost from software to the people configuring it, whatever the vendor.

Answered: Hasitha Varre on July 18, 2026

Your answer

What do operations managers actually want from a BPM platform that process architects and IT teams keep overcomplicating during selection?

I’m digging into what operations managers actually want from a BPM platform that process architects and IT teams keep overcomplicating during selection. The pattern I’m seeing is practical: less architecture, fewer abstract requirements, and more visibility into work getting done.

From business process management software reviews, I’d summarize the ops wishlist this way:

Mobile approvals: Jotform Workflows helps when managers need to approve requests and see status without a complex interface.
Task visibility: Cflow gets credit for a clean UI and organized task views.
Fewer email chains: Kissflow is useful for clearer approval accountability.
Less chasing across departments: Quixy helps automate departmental processes and access MIS data.
Less repetitive work: Microsoft Power Automate works well in Microsoft environments, though troubleshooting can be frustrating.

I’m curious what operations teams wanted most that got deprioritized once selection became more technical.

Ops managers want the process to run and to see where it's stuck. That's mostly it. The overcomplication creeps in when architects model every theoretical edge case that happens twice a year, and the thing becomes unusable for the normal path. My take: design for the common case, handle exceptions manually at first, automate them only once they prove frequent. What percentage of your volume is actually the weird edge cases? Usually it's tiny.

Answered: Hasitha Varre on July 18, 2026

Your answer

Appian vs Nintex for a team that wants to build internal process applications without needing a dedicated developer for every workflow change?

I’m looking at Appian vs Nintex for a team that wants to build internal process applications without needing a dedicated developer for every workflow change. The comparison seems to come down to ownership: who builds, who edits, and who maintains the workflow after launch?

In the business process management category, Appian looks better suited for complex enterprise workflows, case management, data consolidation, and audit-heavy applications. Reviewers say it can turn business requirements into working apps quickly, but advanced UI customization still requires technical depth. Pricing is also a common concern for mid-sized organizations.

Nintex appears more accessible for administrators and non-technical managers, making day-to-day workflow changes. Reviewers highlight drag-and-drop tooling, AI suggestions, document automation, and approval workflows. The tradeoff is that complex workflows can become hard to manage without governance, and the mobile experience has room to improve.

My working question is this: should business users own most changes, or should technical teams still control the complex pieces?

These two sit at different points on the same spectrum, which is the useful thing to notice. One's a heavier low-code platform for building genuine applications, the other leans toward workflow and forms automation that's closer to the process owners. The "without a dev for every change" goal usually points to the lighter end, but only if your apps stay simple. How complex are these internal apps really? If it's mostly forms plus approvals plus routing, the heavyweight platform may be more than you'll ever touch.