G2

Darren .

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

5/27/2026

"Fast, Actionable Pen Testing Baselines with Clear, Customer-Ready Reports"

4.5/5

What do you like best about vPenTest?

vPenTest has been useful for quickly identifying externally exposed weaknesses without requiring a lengthy manual assessment process for every engagement. The automated testing workflow helps provide a practical baseline view of network exposure, insecure services, and common attack paths while still producing reports that are understandable for both technical teams and customer discussions. We also like that it helps prioritize remediation efforts by surfacing issues that are realistically exploitable rather than simply generating overly broad vulnerability lists. The platform integrates well into recurring security review processes and makes it easier to maintain more consistent testing across multiple environments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about vPenTest?

Because the platform is heavily automated, some findings still require additional manual validation and context before being treated as high-confidence risks. Certain reporting sections can also feel repetitive or overly generalized depending on the environment being assessed. While the automation provides efficiency, more advanced customization and deeper investigative visibility would improve flexibility for organizations wanting highly tailored penetration testing workflows. In more complex environments, supplemental manual testing may still be necessary to fully evaluate nuanced security exposures. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is vPenTest solving and how is that benefiting you?

vPenTest has helped reduce the amount of time required to identify externally exposed weaknesses and validate common attack paths across customer environments. Instead of relying solely on manual testing for every engagement, the platform provides a more scalable way to continuously evaluate internet-facing risk and prioritize remediation efforts based on realistic exposure. It has also improved consistency in security assessments by standardizing how findings are collected and reported, which makes it easier to communicate actionable recommendations to both technical staff and management teams. The automated approach has been especially useful for maintaining recurring security reviews without significantly increasing operational overhead. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.