MuhammadQurashi S.
MS
IT Support Engineer
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Complete Device Status Overview by Pulling Data Across Platforms"
4.5/5
What do you like best about ThreatAware?

pulling data from different other platform and give you complete overview of all devices status Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about ThreatAware?

ThreatAware relies heavily on connecting to existing security stacks (like Intune, Jamf, SentinelOne, or Okta) via APIs. If an organization uses niche, legacy, or on-premises security tools that lack public APIs, ThreatAware cannot fetch their telemetry out of the box, requiring custom development or leaving visibility gaps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Ben Clarke-Smith of ThreatAware

Thank you for such a detailed and thoughtful review.

It's great to hear that bringing data together from tools like Intune, Jamf, SentinelOne and Okta into one view is saving your team from jumping between consoles, and that it's helping you spot and fix hygiene gaps faster. Continuous, agentless visibility is exactly what we set out to deliver, so it's good to know it's making a real difference.

You make a fair point about niche, legacy and on-premises tools without public APIs. We're continually expanding our integration library, and customer feedback like yours directly shapes which connectors we prioritise. Where a tool isn't supported out of the box, our team can often help find another way to bring that data in, so there's no need to live with a visibility gap.

If there are specific tools you'd like to see covered, please let your Customer Success Manager know, or get in touch with me directly. We'd love to hear which ones matter most to you.

Thanks again for the review.

See what 7 reviewers think of ThreatAware

4.3 out of 5 · Verified reviews from real users

Read all reviews