G2

Leonardo E.

lelmor@thinkhwi.com

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

Originally submitted 10/14/2019

"Simplicity on the user-interface combined with depth set of features, fields and features"

4/5

What do you like best about MVP One?

Schedule module - drag/drop WO, labor and modify its content. Ability to modify fields in Bulk. Enterprise standardization Customized Fields, user dashboard Personalized reports and searches Concurrent license model Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about MVP One?

- Import/Export wizard could be more flexible allowing a better control over our own data. - Equipment displayed in a geographic, map (e.g. Autocad, plant drawing) would facilitate users to select the proper assets to consult. - Continue the development of a Mobile Platform enabling additional features that currently are only available in the web version. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering MVP One:

Review and compare different alternatives to migrate your previous CMMS data, take the opportunity to standardize on methods, KPIs and engage additional people to the Maintenance Systems (e.g. Operations via Work Request, Storeroom and Procurement for Materials management). Set your budget, the required license model and the objectives for short and long-term. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is MVP One solving and how is that benefiting you?

We are standardize on nomenclature and methods facilitating similar plants to learn from peers PMs, Instructions, Failures, Parts and history. Allowing crafts and operators to have a modern tablet application to initiate and complete WO/WR in the shop-floor.. - Continue the development of a Mobile Platform enabling additional features that currently are only available in the web version. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.