
For me, the biggest advantage is architectural: MuleSoft helps turn integration from a collection of interfaces into an intentional, reusable enterprise architecture. That becomes especially valuable when the same customer, order, product, or inventory capability needs to be consumed by multiple Salesforce orgs and external applications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
From my perspective, I’d like to see a simpler developer experience, stronger out-of-the-box end-to-end observability, and easier dependency/impact analysis across APIs. I also think organizations need to be disciplined about deciding when MuleSoft is genuinely adding architectural value versus introducing another layer for relatively simple integrations. For me, MuleSoft is extremely powerful, but the biggest challenge is making sure that power translates into a simpler, more maintainable enterprise architecture rather than unnecessary integration complexity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.