Verified User in Import and Export
GI
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Flexible Workforce Management, Needs Better Cost Tracking"
4/5
What do you like best about Lano?

What I like most about Lano is its outstanding flexibility to adapt to the diverse global workforce needs. As a B2B Overseas Business Development Manager, I appreciate how it balances Employer of Record services, contractor administration, and global payroll all under one unified system so seamlessly. The integrated contractor management toolkit is a standout feature. It allows me to generate regionally compliant contractor agreements within minutes, aligning with local EU labor regulations, which simplifies compliance and document retrieval. Lano’s versatile global payroll and multi-currency payment functionality is also incredibly valuable. It streamlines the process of batch payment requests and automatically logs payment records, making monthly bookkeeping much easier for our finance team. I also appreciate how Lano facilitates testing new European markets through its EOR solution, providing us agility to explore without high costs. Lano scales perfectly for our setup, reducing my administrative workload and allowing me to focus more on core business priorities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Lano?

The cost tracking view does not support multi-layer budget forecasting. We set annual budgets for regional market agents, yet Lano cannot compare accumulated contractor spending against preset budget thresholds. I have to maintain a separate spreadsheet to monitor budget consumption for our European market expansion plans. I would prioritize the addition of customizable tagging and grouping functionality. The platform should support filtering and aggregating all labor costs by these tags in one click. Built-in budget threshold tracking would be extremely valuable to input budget limits and trigger alerts when approaching or exceeding thresholds, which would eliminate the separate budget spreadsheet. There's a lack of comparative visual dashboards for forecasted versus actual contractor spending across territories. Additionally, Lano's integrations are quite scarce. There is no automated sync between Lano and the tools we use like Apollo.io or Xero, leading to duplicate data entry and inconsistency risks. Lastly, during the setup, language limitations were a small obstacle, as all advanced support resources are only in English, requiring me to create simplified notes for my colleagues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

See what 17 reviewers think of Lano

4.0 out of 5 · Verified reviews from real users

Read all reviews